sticky non-branch tags are sometines treated as branches in empty directories - Bug?

2003-12-03 Thread Paul Gelderblom \(ptok\)
Hi all, We often checkout using a sticky tag, so that developers can work with baselines of code. Normally, checkins on files or directories with a sticky non-branch tag are disabled, which is correct. However, we have found out that sometimes commit on these sticky tags succeed, because

Re: sticky non-branch tags are sometines treated as branches in empty

2003-12-03 Thread Larry Jones
Paul Gelderblom \(ptok\) writes: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Please do not send MIME and/or HTML encrypted messages to the list. Plain text only, PLEASE! However, we have found out that sometimes commit on these sticky tags succeed, because CVS somewhere in the process

Re: CVS Version CHange

2003-12-03 Thread david
Greg Woods: In CVS the release number of RCS-Id is like any useless and almost atrophied organ -- however it's impossible to give it up without also giving up backwards compatability of the internal repository structure. It also is necessary as a magic cookie - an otherwise meaningless but

Re: Problems with uncommitted working directories, from home and work.

2003-12-03 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Tuesday, December 2, 2003 at 18:04:35 (-0800), Mark D. Baushke wrote: ] Subject: Re: Problems with uncommitted working directories, from home and work. I suppose you could also consider the Unison File Synchronizer (see http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/ for details) as a way to

Re: Problems with uncommitted working directories, from home and work.

2003-12-03 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greg A. Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [ On Tuesday, December 2, 2003 at 18:04:35 (-0800), Mark D. Baushke wrote: ] Subject: Re: Problems with uncommitted working directories, from home and work. I suppose you could also consider the Unison

Re: CVS Version CHange

2003-12-03 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Wednesday, December 3, 2003 at 12:36:35 (-0600), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ] Subject: Re: CVS Version CHange Could be. The RCS revision number looks too much like a standard sort of release designation, and that leads to trouble. It appears to contain more information than is needed to