How can I view files with a specific tag in CVS?

2004-06-30 Thread PL
Hi! Anyone knows if there is a CVS command that can be used to see which files (and their version) that has been tagged with a specific tag? If I do cvs status -v I get a lot of info on every file, including *all* tags. I guess I could write a script that extracs file name with tag, using

Merge Confusion

2004-06-30 Thread work
sources - cvs -q up -dP tag the repository - cvs tag rel_1-20040630 I go into the rel_2/testproj sandbox and issue the following commands: make sure i have the latest srouces - cvs -q up -dP tag the repository - cvs tag rel_2-20040630 Now I'm ready to merge. Since I want to merge from

RE: How can I view files with a specific tag in CVS?

2004-06-30 Thread Jim.Hyslop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone knows if there is a CVS command that can be used to see which files (and their version) that has been tagged with a specific tag? cvs -nq up -r tag-you-are-interested-in -- Jim Hyslop Senior Software Designer Leitch Technology International Inc.

RE: CVS tags

2004-06-30 Thread Jim.Hyslop
Khyati Nayak wrote: I have tags assigned to some of my files in the repository to mark them for something different. Now if one of these files is updated and committed, how do I get the tag on the latest version? Or get rid of it from the old and add it to new? Use the -F option. -- Jim

Re: Merge Confusion

2004-06-30 Thread Sergei Organov
sure i have the latest sources - cvs -q up -dP tag the repository - cvs tag rel_1-20040630 I go into the rel_2/testproj sandbox and issue the following commands: make sure i have the latest srouces - cvs -q up -dP tag the repository - cvs tag rel_2-20040630 Now I'm ready to merge. Since I

Re: listing new files in a local directory

2004-06-30 Thread Brian Gough
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hanny) writes: I'd like a cvs command that tells me what files in the current directory are new. One hack that I've been using is cvs update. The files that are prefixed by '?' are new. Unfortunately, this has the side-effect of updating my local directory files if

Re: Merge Confusion

2004-06-30 Thread Sergei Organov
Jim.Hyslop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: work wrote: [...] At this point, I'm not overly concerned about deleted or added files (to me they are much easier to deal with since the entire file is involved). You will have to use 'cvs add' and 'cvs remove' to have these files added or removed

Re: Merge Confusion

2004-06-30 Thread Larry Jones
Jim.Hyslop writes [re merging]: You will have to use 'cvs add' and 'cvs remove' to have these files added or removed from the trunk. Not so -- a merge with two -j options should handle that automatically. -Larry Jones What a stupid world. -- Calvin

RE: Merge Confusion

2004-06-30 Thread Jim.Hyslop
Sergei Organov wrote: Jim.Hyslop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You will have to use 'cvs add' and 'cvs remove' to have these files added or removed from the trunk. I don't think he will. At least for me it works automatically. I mean all the files are already added/removed after the

Re: Smoke, FUD (was Re: CVS corrupts binary files ...)

2004-06-30 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Monday, June 28, 2004 at 19:02:19 (-0700), Paul Sander wrote: ] Subject: Re: Smoke, FUD (was Re: CVS corrupts binary files ...) I have never, ever advocated changing the format of an RCS file in a way that would break the ci, co, rcs, or rlog programs. And although I strongly advocate

User name on commit is not what I want

2004-06-30 Thread Stephen Carville
Whenever a module is checked in, the username is whoever did the commit. I want the user to always be cvs:cvs. I know there is a way to do this -- something in the passwd file I think -- but I cannot find it in the manual. I use cvs 1.11.1p1 witjh both :pserver: and :ext: connections --

Re: Smoke, FUD (was Re: CVS corrupts binary files ...)

2004-06-30 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Tuesday, June 29, 2004 at 02:18:26 (-0700), Paul Sander wrote: ] Subject: Re: Smoke, FUD (was Re: CVS corrupts binary files ...) I.e. How do you propose to make it possible for the standard RCS tools alone to re-create _every_ revision from all files created by this hacked system?

Re: Smoke, FUD (was Re: CVS corrupts binary files ...)

2004-06-30 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Monday, June 28, 2004 at 14:58:03 (-0700), Mark D. Baushke wrote: ] Subject: Re: Smoke, FUD (was Re: CVS corrupts binary files ...) Yes, but diff is not diff3. diff is used for the delta format. diff3 is used by rcsmerge, not for fundamental version deltas. I think you're confused --

Re: Project in a cvs, library in another

2004-06-30 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Monday, June 21, 2004 at 17:50:49 (-0500), Ababccc wrote: ] Subject: Project in a cvs, library in another I'm wondering what people usually do, in case there is a project on CVS which uses a C++ library which is in a completely separated CVS. If the library gets changed (for its own

RE: CVS corrupts binary files ...

2004-06-30 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Tuesday, June 29, 2004 at 19:34:25 (-0700), Paul Sander wrote: ] Subject: RE: CVS corrupts binary files ... When you speak about how great NASA is and mention the antiquity of some of their processes, remember that the paper checklists have since contributed to the failure of several

RE: binary files bad idea? why?

2004-06-30 Thread Eric Gorr
I want to play with the diff patch tools a bit myself just to see if I could see something go wrong with CVS and binary files if those files were run through something that would binhex them (similar to uuencoding) via a CVS wrapper. Everything seemed to work as I expected. If I understand

inflate: unknown compression method after server upgrade to 1.11.16

2004-06-30 Thread David Carson
When I use a client which inserts the global '-l' option together with my newly upgraded server, I get the expected global `-l' option ignored warning. However, if I also specify a compression level, I get the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tools] cvs -nq -z1 up cvs update: inflate: unknown