- and experiences welcome.
Dave
-Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ---
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert| Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM,SPARC,PPC HPPA | In Hex /
\ _|_ http://www.treblig.org
a repository which has had my patch inflicted on it.
(The existing cvs code that rewrites the file will remove any
excess white space you added up there anyway.)
Dave
-Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ---
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert| Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K
* Jim Hyslop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
2) I could do with a better under standing of the directory locks;
pointers? I've read the top of lock.c but it still doesn't tell me
enough; for example there seem to be multiple lock files used - but
then surely
; but I'm up for suggestions.
Dave
-Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ---
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert| Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM,SPARC,PPC HPPA | In Hex /
\ _|_ http
to ensure consistency, or is the
locking that is carried out sufficient?
Does this make sense?
Dave
-Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ---
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert| Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM,SPARC,PPC
[Resend: I sent it with the wrong 'from' address - apologies
if you get both]
* Mark D. Baushke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your reply.
Dr. David Alan Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So - here are my questions/ideas
* performed by cvs itself? i.e. would my
trick (if I can solve the interrupted write case) be completely
safe with any use of cvs as long as you didn't access the files
externally?
Dave
-Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ---
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert| Running GNU
* Mark D. Baushke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dr. David Alan Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, if I create a dummy ,foo.c, before
modifying (or create a hardlink with that name
to foo.c,v ?) would that be sufficient?
I would say
