RE: merge mode for XML

2002-05-15 Thread Sean Hager
This thread is a die hard, but it is still the best conversation on the list ;) sean. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Ring Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 7:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: merge mode for XML

RE: merge mode for XML

2002-05-06 Thread Sean Hager
I disargee. Doing this would force a policy onto CVS users where such a policy isn't really necessary. I think using extensions for any decision making is bad.Don't you think it would be bad to force the same diff/merge onto several files that had no extension? There's two

RE: merge mode for XML

2002-05-03 Thread Sean Hager
No. Not on extension, but based on *regular expressions*, or at least shell-style pattern matching expressions. Extensions are too simplistic. (c.f. CVSROOT/cvswrappers, CVSROOT/cvsignore) Extensions would work fine, pattern matching is overkill. Yes. Some mechanisms like

RE: merge mode for XML

2002-05-03 Thread Sean Hager
Yeah. That'd be a cool feature. But then, CVS will no longer be a standalone program. If you move the repository to another server where the modules are missing, how would you expect CVS to behave? The plugins would be part of the module, so if you moved the module to another CVS

RE: merge mode for XML

2002-05-03 Thread Sean Hager
No. Not on extension, but based on *regular expressions*, or at least shell-style pattern matching expressions. Extensions are too simplistic. (c.f. CVSROOT/cvswrappers, CVSROOT/cvsignore) Extensions would work fine, pattern matching is overkill. Neither is suitable

RE: merge mode for XML

2002-04-29 Thread Sean Hager
A better approach is to avoid XML entirely in the first place -- it's a really really horrid syntax with all kinds of goo that's usually way over-kill for the application, being SGML based and all that I agree that XML is overkill, but the truth is that it is here to stay. XML is

RE: merge mode for XML

2002-04-26 Thread Sean Hager
), Sean Hager wrote: ] Subject: merge mode for XML Is there a merge mode or merge algorithm that works well for XML files? Doesn't diff3 work well enough? XML files are more or less just text, right? If the tags are all on separate lines, then regardless of whether content

merge mode for XML

2002-04-25 Thread Sean Hager
Is there a merge mode or merge algorithm that works well for XML files? Any experience here? Sean. ___ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs