RE: Log data for branches

2003-03-26 Thread Mike Ayers
From: Eric Siegerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 6:23 PM On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:34:08PM -0800, Mike Ayers wrote: Hmmm - not the results I got... cvs server: invalid option -- S Usage: cvs server [-lRhtNb] [-r[revisions]] [-d dates] [-s states]

Log data for branches

2003-03-25 Thread Mike Ayers
I created a test project to illustrate a problem that I am having. I added a file, SwingApplication.java, then branched branch1. I made some changes in SwingApplication.java for both files, then added a new file, SwingApplication2.java, on the main branch. Here's the log

RE: Log data for branches

2003-03-25 Thread Douglas Finkle
I have been meaning to get this back to Karl Fogel. This is what we did: === RCS file: /system/cvsroot/buildsvc/src/cvs2cl.pl,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -c -r1.1 -r1.2 *** buildsvc/src/cvs2cl.pl2002/05/21

RE: Log data for branches

2003-03-25 Thread Mike Ayers
From: Douglas Finkle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:32 PM I have been meaning to get this back to Karl Fogel. Actually, you should send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't think Karl is the maintainer anymore. I'll get my diffs done as well, in case they

Re: Log data for branches

2003-03-25 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 03:20:50PM -0800, Mike Ayers wrote: [cvs log -rbranch1, on a file without the branch, says:] cvs server: warning: no revision `branch1' in `/export/cvs/personal/mayers/testing123/z1/SwingApplication2.java,v' RCS file:

RE: Log data for branches

2003-03-25 Thread Mike Ayers
From: Eric Siegerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 4:56 PM In 1.11.5, on that file, cvs log -rbranch1 would have suppressed the revisions, though it would still have printed the header information. The new(ish?) -S option would have suppressed the header as well,

Re: Log data for branches

2003-03-25 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:34:08PM -0800, Mike Ayers wrote: Hmmm - not the results I got... cvs server: invalid option -- S Usage: cvs server [-lRhtNb] [-r[revisions]] [-d dates] [-s states] Note who's complaining -- cvs server, not cvs log. Your client may be 1.11.5, but your server