RE: Major revision numbers

2004-04-07 Thread Jim.Hyslop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: revision numbers are for CVS's internal use, you should not care what they are. Use tags if you want meaningful information. Weee... for the most part I agree. However, there are times when you need to compare two revisions that are not tagged. If we followed the

Re: Major revision numbers

2004-04-07 Thread david
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: revision numbers are for CVS's internal use, you should not care what they are. Use tags if you want meaningful information. Weee... for the most part I agree. However, there are times when you need to compare two revisions that are not tagged. If we

Re: Major revision numbers

2004-04-06 Thread Larry Jones
Krzysztof GORBIEL writes: As I can read in CVS manual, new file added to a module should obtain major revision number eqal to the highest revision number in that directory (for example 2.1 if highest existing revision nubmer is 2.xx). Unfortunately it doesn't work. New file will have

Major revision numbers

2004-04-05 Thread Krzysztof GORBIEL
As I can read in CVS manual, new file added to a module should obtain major revision number eqal to the highest revision number in that directory (for example 2.1 if highest existing revision nubmer is 2.xx). Unfortunately it doesn't work. New file will have revision 1.1. I have noticed this