On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Les Bell wrote:
> > What about simply disallowing non-subscribers from posting?
> By FSF fiat, that option is unavailable.
> Sigh. Why am I not surprised? Time to start looking for alternative list
> hosting, perhaps even at groups.google.com? The current level of spam on
>
Eric Siegerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> What about simply disallowing non-subscribers from posting?
By FSF fiat, that option is unavailable.
<<
Sigh. Why am I not surprised? Time to start looking for alternative list
hosting, perhaps even at groups.google.com? The current level of spam
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:33:14AM -0700, David Wheeler wrote:
> What about simply disallowing non-subscribers from posting?
By FSF fiat, that option is unavailable.
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | /
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball kn
R P Herrold wrote:
>
> Proposal: I propose to undertake to offer to moderate. If so
for += 1
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
R P Herrold wrote:
>
> Proposal: I propose to undertake to offer to moderate. If so
> designated, in moderating, my moderation will initially
> consist of turning on the option to catch and hold, pending
> discard, all non-subscriber posts. I seek to manage held
> posts at least daily, often a c
