day, July 13, 2001 at 12:19:09 (-0700), Jimmy Rimmer wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: How well does CVS handle other types of data?
>
> Or, you could just use the patch for reserved checkouts:
> http://www.cvshome.org/cyclic/cvs/dev-reserve.html
No, you can't. That does nothing for branches
c: Noel L Yap)|
| Subject: FW: Reserved checkouts. |
>|
Members Equity Email System
Sorry about this but I forgot to mention
t" ie it does not fail when I've tried to check it out as another
user. Any ideas ?
-Original Message-
From: Noel L Yap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 3 May 2001 2:34AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Reserved checkouts.
Le
" ie it does not fail when I've tried to check it out as another
user. Any ideas ?
-Original Message-
From: Noel L Yap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 3 May 2001 2:34AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Reserved checkouts.
Let m
D]]
Sent: Thursday, 3 May 2001 2:34AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Reserved checkouts.
Let me make things more explicit. With the patches and 'edit -c' and
'checkin
-c' in ~/.cvsrc, the work flow would be:
1. Developer checks out
[ On Wednesday, May 2, 2001 at 20:11:14 (+1000), Richard Sharp wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: Reserved checkouts.
>
> Members Equity Email System
> But I do need to use reserved checkouts - I have examined the issues for and
> against and have decided on reserved checkouts. Some of our
t contact
other editors for any reason.
Noel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2001.05.02 06:11:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Noel L Yap)
Subject: RE: Reserved checkouts.
Members Equity Email System
But I do need to use reserved checkouts - I have examined the issues for and
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 08:11:14PM +1000, Richard Sharp wrote:
> Members Equity Email System
> But I do need to use reserved checkouts - I have examined the issues for and
> against and have decided on reserved checkouts. Some of our files will not
> be able to be merged as they are g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2001.05.02 10:21:54
>What you want is some way of controlling who's working on the
>file at any given time, and the CVS way to do that is to set
>"cvs watch on" all files that you want to control, and ask
>the developers to use "cvs edit" to unlock them. This isn't
>stric
Richard Sharp wrote:
>
> Members Equity Email System
> But I do need to use reserved checkouts - I have examined the issues for and
> against and have decided on reserved checkouts. Some of our files will not
> be able to be merged as they are graphic files etc. Any ideas ?
&g
ou want them.
You'll only "need" to use reserved checkouts if your developers refuse to stick
to procedures.
Noel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2001.05.02 06:11:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Noel L Yap)
Subject: RE: Reserved checkouts.
Members Equity Email
Members Equity Email System
But I do need to use reserved checkouts - I have examined the issues for and
against and have decided on reserved checkouts. Some of our files will not
be able to be merged as they are graphic files etc. Any ideas ?
-Original Message-
From: Henner Zeller
Don't use reserved checkouts -- they should be buried in Software
Configuration Management history. As such, they are not actively supported
by CVS.
If you want to have something similar, but much more flexible (locking +
still the possibility to edit it by others with automatic notificati
Members Equity Email System
Hi all,
from my reading of the docs (I'm new to CVS), you can have reserved check
outs if you issue a cvs admin -l. I've tried this (I'm using CVS 1.11), it
locks the file but still allows another user to check this file out. How can
we force reserved
14 matches
Mail list logo