Hi,
Several months ago we removed a file from the CVS tree, and now we are
trying to check a file with the same name back in again.
1038 percival:Keil | cvs update
cvs update: Updating .
cvs update: use `cvs add' to create an entry for standalonegeneva.lnp
1039 percival:Keil | cvs add
Hi,
I'm trying to tag by date on a branch, but so far I did manage to get
it right. I'm using 1.10.7.
What I've tried is
- rtag with -r and -D on which cvs complains they are mutually
exclusive
- tag -D on a checked-out copy of that branch. It tagged the main
trunk instead
- tag -r -D
confirm
440590
One more data point. When I do a checkout on the cvs server, it is *very*
fast. Does that mean that the bottleneck is network and not CPU, memory or I/O?
=
=o o o o o o o . . . __ _===_||___
o _ | James A. N. Stauffer | |
Several months ago we removed a file from the CVS tree, and now we are
trying to check a file with the same name back in again.
[omissis]
1040 percival:Keil | cvs commit
cvs commit: Examining .
cvs commit: cannot add file `standalonegeneva.lnp' when RCS file
"Parand T. Darugar" wrote:
Everything I've read suggests that doing what I want to
do is frowned upon in CVS. My choices are to go with RCS
and not get the benefits of CVS, which I'm loathe to do,
or to build a very simple file locking mechanism alongside
CVS. I'm half way through
Hello,
I am new at this stuff, but I think I have thoroughly checked manuals,
FAQs, and this list's archive. I have found discussions that come close
but none that address this issue.
I have modules defined such that I can check out the following structure:
test/
CVS/
a.c
myproj/
"Parand T. Darugar" wrote:
I'd like to setup CVS for a web based project
that involves multiple developers. We would like
to have those multiple developers access the
same directory of source code, as opposed to each
having their own working area. The reason behind this
is that everyone
I've a new CVS user but an old hand at DEC's CMS code management system.
The latter was very good about allowing multiple people in one area. CVS
isn't so strong there. I think it is because old-tyme Unix hacks tended to
be lone programmers working on smaller projects and therefore didn't
Keith D Richeson writes:
This works fine, but there are other files on the same level as a.c, and
another directory on that level also (parallel to myproj/). The problem
comes when I want to update. In the test directory described above, I type
cvs update. The problem is that when I do
Hi Joerg,
The the standard version of cvs available from cvshome.org, the -D
switch only applies to the mainline and will not work with a branch.
If you need/want a version of cvs that lets -D work with branches,
then you may wish to checkout a copy of the FreeBSD version of cvs
which has been
Howdy --
What about the CVS repository itself?
Our repository has grown into quite the bohemoth in the
last few years. It's 150 some directories, making up almost
2 millions lines of code.
There are at least 17 live branches. Some files have, literally,
thousands of versions.
How much of a
I think that it would be better to use RCS in that case. By default
CVS does not require a lock to modify a file, therefore developers
would be able to do changes to the same file and some work by be lost.
With RCS, by default, you have to do a check-out to be able to work on
a file.
Dear Pascal,
In any case, beware of doing tests using "sources" files being
edited. While I edit a file, I save it often, and most often, it's on
the disk in a non-compilable (non-usable) state. To do your tests in
your environment, all your developers should stop edit all their
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 11:48:36AM -, Ross Burton wrote:
Several months ago we removed a file from the CVS tree, and now we are
trying to check a file with the same name back in again.
1038 percival:Keil | cvs update # Normal output deleted
1039 percival:Keil | cvs
I was having a similar experience, well over 300 directories, and we
apply tags daily (non branching at least).
We are running local mode on NT.
We recently 're-org'd the repository, by doing a checkout of the end of
the old project, and importing that as an entirely new top-level. It
worked
16 matches
Mail list logo
