Re: Configure acl's for CVS

2003-09-22 Thread Jacek_Wolski
Hello, I had the problem you discribe by myself. According to my findings there are at least three possibilities: a) a script in CVS distribution (/usr/local/cvs-1.11.6/contrib): cvs_aclsA perl script that implements Access Control Lists by using the

about log and rdiff commands

2003-09-22 Thread Julien Wajsberg
Hi, I'm experimenting a little with the log command, and I found a strange behaviour. When using cvs log -rHEAD, I successfully get the log messages for the trunk. But wit cvs log -rHEAD., (with a dot) which should give me the log message for the last revisions on the trunk, I just get: cvs

Re: about log and rdiff commands

2003-09-22 Thread Larry Jones
Julien Wajsberg writes: When using cvs log -rHEAD, I successfully get the log messages for the trunk. No, you don't. HEAD is the most recent revision on the *default* branch, which need not be the trunk; it could be a vendor branch. And you should only get the log message for the most

working areas

2003-09-22 Thread Joseph.VanQuakebeke
All; We seem to have two different styles to working with CVS here and I wantto know what the standard is in the community. One group says that you never ever change your working area. You just do updates and keep working on. The other group says you should change your working area and

Re: working areas

2003-09-22 Thread Tom Copeland
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 12:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All; We seem to have two different styles to working with CVS here and I want to know what the standard is in the community. One group says that you never ever change your working area. You just do updates and keep working on.

Re: working areas

2003-09-22 Thread Rob Helmer
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:37:08PM -0400, Tom Copeland wrote: On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 12:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All; We seem to have two different styles to working with CVS here and I want to know what the standard is in the community. One group says that you never ever

RE: working areas

2003-09-22 Thread Joseph.VanQuakebeke
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:37:08PM -0400, Tom Copeland wrote: On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 12:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All; We seem to have two different styles to working with CVS here and I want to know what the standard is in the community. One group says that you never ever

Limiting access to certain files within the repository.

2003-09-22 Thread Larry Lords
We are running a client/server configuration using SSH. The server in running Linux and cvs 1.11.6 and clients are using mainly CVSNT. In order to refactor the build we need to limit the access to the build.xml file to a limited group. I have looked through the documentation, but still not sure

Re: Limiting access to certain files within the repository.

2003-09-22 Thread Larry Jones
Larry Lords writes: In order to refactor the build we need to limit the access to the build.xml file to a limited group. I have looked through the documentation, but still not sure what to do to limit the access? CVS cannot limit access to a single file, only to a directory. -Larry Jones

Re: Limiting access to certain files within the repository.

2003-09-22 Thread JacobRhoden
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 07:16 am, Larry Jones wrote: Larry Lords writes: In order to refactor the build we need to limit the access to the build.xml file to a limited group. I have looked through the documentation, but still not sure what to do to limit the access? CVS cannot limit access to