In PkXs8.421$[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jay Glanville
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks Martin. It's a good start, but not all that I was looking for. By
using the -d option, what I'm doing is front-loading the naming
architecture. In other words, anytime I use module amp1, it will be under a
Pierre Asselin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
a92viq$oed$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:a92viq$oed$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In PkXs8.421$[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jay
Glanville [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks Martin. It's a good start, but not all that I was looking for.
By
using the -d option, what I'm
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Martin Heinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:09:27PM +, Jay Glanville wrote:
[ ... ]
Now, is there a way to say that module amp1 should be included in module mod
and be placed in a directory called tools. For example, when I do a
checkout of
Martin Heinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:09:27PM +, Jay Glanville wrote:
When a module has an ampersand module as part of it's definition, the
ampersand module gets included in the root of the other module. My
questio
is:
I have a question concerning ampersand modules, and I'm hoping someone here
can help me.
When a module has an ampersand module as part of it's definition, the
ampersand module gets included in the root of the other module. My questio
is: is there a way to have the ampersand module included in a
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:09:27PM +, Jay Glanville wrote:
When a module has an ampersand module as part of it's definition, the
ampersand module gets included in the root of the other module. My questio
is: is there a way to have the ampersand module included in a subdirectory?
For
I'm curious about ampersand modules.
Once a regular module (containing another module via the "" construct)
is checked out, does that module actually *know* that it contains the
contained module?
If my modules file says something like this:
frobnicator frobnicator caturgiator
...and I do
Laird Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm curious about ampersand modules.
Once a regular module (containing another module via the "" construct)
is checked out, does that module actually *know* that it contains the
contained module?
If my modules file says something like this:
On Wednesday, November 29, 2000 10:22 AM, Laine Stump
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Laird Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm curious about ampersand modules.
Once a regular module (containing another module via the "" construct)
is checked out, does that module actually *know* that
