From: Christian Andersson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I have some genereated source-files that I need to have in the cvs
Why must they be in CVS?
the problem I have is that these files often gets generated
when there is nothing changed to them (it is part of some compilation
sections)
-Original Message-
From: Christian Andersson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Does it really matter why? WHY is NOT the problem...
how to make CVS work in my case is the important thing to solve...
No, how to get the generated file to the developers is the problem to solve.
CVS is just
From: Christian Andersson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
the problem I have is that these files often gets generated
when there is nothing changed to them (it is part of some compilation
sections) what happens is that I get new generated files that
has only
one difference, a remark in
From: Riechers, Matthew W
Again, why does something generated by a build need to be revision
controlled?
I wrote:
The generated files don't need to be revision controlled, but they need to
be available to people or tools who cannot run the tool that generates the
files. The most convenient
--- Frederic Brehm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The generated files don't need to be revision
controlled, but they need to
be available to people or tools who cannot run the
tool that generates the
files. The most convenient way to make the files
available is to put them
into the repository
--- Frederic Brehm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote:
The generated files don't need to be revision
controlled, but they need to
be available to people or tools who cannot run the
tool that generates the
files. The most convenient way to make the files
available is to put them
into
At 07:06 AM 8/22/2002 -0700, Noel Yap wrote:
Have you tried:
1. Version control the generated file.
Yes, I version control a canonical form of the generated file.
2. Build the generated file if the necessary tools are
available.
The tool does this without asking when it is run. It's a GUI,
At 07:12 AM 8/22/2002 -0700, Noel Yap wrote:
I don't understand, if Makefile.cache has to be in
synch with the other files:
1. Why are there systems that are able to commit, but
can't build Makefile.cache?
There are no such systems. I'm not sure where my text misled you into
thinking that, but
Christian Andersson writes:
the problem I have is that these files often gets generated
when there is nothing changed to them (it is part of some compilation
sections) what happens is that I get new generated files that has only
one difference, a remark in the file telling when it was
Does it really matter why? WHY is NOT the problem...
how to make CVS work in my case is the important thing to solve...
No, how to get the generated file to the developers is the problem to
solve.
CVS is just one potential means to that end.
why I cannot change the distribution is
At 04:52 PM 8/22/2002 +0200, Christian Andersson wrote:
I asked for a sollution to MY problem, not to a different problem with how
things are set up, so why not ignore why, and how and just answer my problem?
OK.
Is it possible for cvs to ignore certain rows in a file when comparing for
11 matches
Mail list logo
