On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:43:44 -0800,
Rob Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED] (rt) writes:
rt (I know a lot of people swear by postfix, but I stick with sendmail
rt because I know the product and in this world of nasty hackers, using
rt an unfamiliar MTA is a very scarry thought. But does anyone know,
rt
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Rob Tanner wrote:
privileges. Since all the mailboxes are owned by the Cyrus user, what
would be more secure of a system that just does mail delivery woulkd
be a hack to sendmail so that once it attaches to port 25 it drops root
and runs as the Cyrus user. Show me a
Cillian Sharkey wrote:
Lawrence Greenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It never occured to me before, but I don't think there is a way of
disabling the quota once it's been set. Probably deleting the user and
recreating it would work.
Or another way is to just delete the quota file for
privileges. Since all the mailboxes are owned by the Cyrus user, what
would be more secure of a system that just does mail delivery woulkd
be a hack to sendmail so that once it attaches to port 25 it drops root
and runs as the Cyrus user. Show me a hack like that, and Cyrus wins
hands
Hello,
In the past, I have seen several mentions of patches to Cyrus to allow it
to serve virtual domains. Does anyone have a collection of these patches
available and further, what are the realistic chances of having something
like this rolled into the main release?
I have been struggling to
Hi people,
I'm a newbie to Cyrus, but I'm liking what I'm seeing sofar. I'm planning
a migration of our company mail-server to cyrus, mainly because we want to
use subfolders in imap and because we'd like some shared mailboxes without
having the associated Linux-users.
I've got the Cyrus imap
I figured out the problem, thanks largely to Jean-Michel Doublet.
I enabled debugging on the LMTP daemon that had the socket open (in cyrus.conf,
'cmd="lmtpd -a"'), and saw that it was trying to create a directory called
"/var/spool/imap/stage." which already existed.
By removing that
Hi all.
[TIA]
I just compiled the latest version of Cyrus (tried CVS version too). The compile
itself goes smoothly, no problems. But, when thats done I try to run cyradm and
it fails to see the SASL libs.
Which perl/makefile needs fixing?
venus# ldconfig -r |grep sasl
71:-lsasl.8
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Gilion Goudsmit wrote:
I used the following to send something
to my mailbox:
cat /etc/printcap | /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver-wrapper giel
cat /etc/printcap | /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver-wrapper user.giel
cat /etc/printcap | /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver giel
cat /etc/printcap |
Almost all ISPs that are using Cyrus+LDAP etc are doing similar things.
You may like to have a look at
http://ispman.sourceforge.net
The software was built to fullfill these requirements.
cheers
"Kevin M. Myer" wrote:
Hello,
In the past, I have seen several mentions of patches to Cyrus to
Your email 1031055, Fri, 16 Mar 2001 04:03:41 +0800 containing HTML junk is not wanted
here for security reasons. It has been bounced without human intervention.
-- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. --
Received: from james.berdmann.de ([192.168.1.1])
by
Excellent catch. This looks like a bug; as you might've guessed, we
don't yet use client side authentication with STARTTLS, and this code
was only tested a few times when it was first inserted.
I'll apply the patch you suggest.
The dn mapping is an open problem across multiple protocols and
** The following is an automated reply from ADMIN **
I will be away from the office 3-10-2001 to 3-21-2001.
Your e-mail will be stored and I will read it upon my return.
In the interim, please direct all requests to the following
individuals according to your needs:
* All computer work
Hi,
I've gone over and over my configuration, of which there's not much to
configure, and I'm completely baffled. I'm running (or trying to) sasl
1.5.24, cyrus imap 2.0.12 on a Solaris 2.7 system. This is what I've
configured:
imap was buit with:
--with-auth=unix
SASL was built with:
Make sure it doesn't have a berkeley mailbox seperator
in the header, either. This is the line that begins
with "From " (as opposed to the one that starts "From:",
which is ok).
for people who *really* don't want to get rid of (or can't
get rid of) leading "From " lines..
Do I have to accept e-mail for unknown users? or can I have sendmail check
that the user actually exists when e-mail comes in? If so...is there
documentation on doing this anywhere?
I remember seeing something about this on this list quite awhile ago, but I
can't find it by searching the
It does bounce it...but why can't I block it during the incoming SMTP
transmission instead of replying "250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient ok"?
-
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Rob Tanner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 19:50
To: Josh Miller; Cyrus-Info
18 matches
Mail list logo
