I have been having some trouble configuring cyrus. Version 2.0.12.
Firing up master, I get the following activity in syslog:
May 21 15:55:51 animul master[17008]: process started
May 21 15:55:51 animul ctl_mboxlist[17009]: running mboxlist recovery
May 21 15:56:13 animul ctl_mboxlist[17009]: don
Can you share some information like the hardware used, the maximum
number of connections supported, performances at peak load etc.
I have to make an webmail for 300k users and I don't know where to
start :(
Thank you,
Stefanita Vilcu
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Atif Ghaffar wrote:
> hi Stefanita ,
>
Hy!
On 21-May-2001 Amos Gouaux wrote:
> nj> I think the file close should be equal to a sync. Am I right?
>
> not necessarily.
Ok, I'll fix it.
> nj> with 300'000 folders, and 4-5000 active users (daily). Cross your fingers
> ;)
>
> perhaps your users are the ones that should cross their
hi Stefanita ,
We had a system deployed last year thats using GFS, sharing data over 8
machines.
2 of them are acting as a HA cluster using Cyrus spool from GFS.
Havent seen any problems with that yet .
please note: There is only one system running Cyrus at any time.
The version of Cyrus used
> On Mon, 21 May 2001 17:53:34 +0200 (CEST),
> Noll Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nj) writes:
nj> So far, so good ;)
that's good.
nj> To think of it, maybe Berkeley DB could be used. It might even be better... if
nj> you can specify it the amount of cache memory to use.
just doing a qui
Hello!
I''ve installed cyrus imap, and now I've two problems:
First:
isserver:/home/iced# killall -HUP inetd
isserver:/home/iced# su cyrus
cyrus@isserver:/home/iced$ imtest -m login -p imap localhost
C: C01 CAPABILITY
S: * OK isserver Cyrus IMAP4 v1.6.24 server ready
S: * CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4r
Hello,
Is there anybody who has used the spool directory of a Cyrus IMAPD on
the Global Filesystem on Linux? I want to use two machines with Cyrus,
sharing the same spool. Are there any locking or cache problems?
Are there any performance issues?
Thank you,
Stefanita Vilcu
--
Stefanita Valeriu
> On Mon, 21 May 2001 10:45:14 +0200 (CEST),
> Noll Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nj) writes:
nj> You might be right, but fsync() might not be needed.
why gamble on something so crucial? this is inviting disaster.
nj> I think the file close should be equal to a sync. Am I right?
not
Hello Ken,
please excuse my not having
well read the vacation draft.
The local hostname of lrp.rz.fh-ulm.de
is configured as "lrp", and a local
message to rahlfs@lrp succeeds
concerning vacation even without
the :addresses options.
Therefore:
If I only want to use to vacation-
reply messages se
Ken Murchison wrote:
> Try changing your script to:
>
> require ["vacation","reject","fileinto"];
>
> vacation :addresses "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "testing3";
>
>
Much thanks, Ken, this was it!
In draft-showalter-sieve-vacation-03
'":address" string-list' is optional.
Is there a more present do
Hy!
You might be right, but fsync() might not be needed.
The program deals with the files as follows:
- At the start, mailbox.base and mailbox.ext are opened for reading,
then the program reads all the data, and closes the files.
- 99.9% of the time, the program serves everything from mem
11 matches
Mail list logo
