RE: Death by 11

I as well had (hopefully) the same problem. I have not had any errors today and I re-compiled and re-install early this morning. I would have had at least 10 dealth messages by 3:00pm, anyway, this is what I did. 1. Created the following link in /usr/lib/ libdb-3.so -> libdb-3.2.so. O

RE: Death by 11

Yes. Just to be sure, I tried recompiling sasl and cyrus again. Still have the same problem. -Dan > -Original Message- > From: Tarjei Huse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: January 28, 2002 11:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > S

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 21:38, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > Joe Rhett wrote: > > > > Any chance one of you could do this so that the branch is validated and up > > to date, please? Briref note I have a patch for this (taken from the cvs ) at:- http://www.surf.org.uk/downloads/HIERSEP-r2.patch

Re: plain text authentification

Hello, Athentication via PLAIN requires that one of several backend methods are available to do the actual authentication. In the SASL readme.html doc it lists sasldb, pwcheck daemon, or the saslauthd daemon. I believe you may also write a method of your own. We use the saslauthd daemon for seve

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

Joe Rhett wrote: > > Any chance one of you could do this so that the branch is validated and up > to date, please? There is no further development on any branches other than HEAD at this time (um, well, Rob is working on some sieve byte-code stuff but this is limited to a small set of files

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

Any chance one of you could do this so that the branch is validated and up to date, please? This is your baby :-} On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 04:05:54PM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: > If you *REALLY* need this functionality for 2.0.16, I'd suggest doing > this via CVS. Grab the 'hier-sep' branch an

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

If you *REALLY* need this functionality for 2.0.16, I'd suggest doing this via CVS. Grab the 'hier-sep' branch and the merge the 'cyrus-release-2-0-16' tag. Ken Enric Ramos wrote: > > Hi. > > Firstofall thanks for your help... > I've found the HIERSEP-r2.patch for cyrus-imapd-2.0.15.. > >

Re: Death by 11

Have you checked the death by 11 section of cyrus-utils.sf.net/faq? Tarjei > Hello, > > I initially thought this was a permissions issue when I saw similar > messages. > I've about convinced myself that its not and am now thinking that it > may be > a library issue, ie can't find the one it wants

SIGCHLD vs process_msg, on 2.0.16 - linux (a bug?)

Hi everybody I'm running cyrus-imapd-2.0.16 on redhat linux 7.1, but there is a strange behaviour in cyrus that I figured out that it might be a bug, at least on linux. imagine the following situation: we have a used(as stated in service.c) service and its idle for 60 seconds, when select() return

Re: Death by 11

Hello, I initially thought this was a permissions issue when I saw similar messages. I've about convinced myself that its not and am now thinking that it may be a library issue, ie can't find the one it wants. My problem is that when sendmail invokes deliver, deliver dies with the signal 11. Has

tdY7oZvLFR8NIEnQE9kwI ------------上次沒買到這次要快!------ IiqdHDafxxjghICM4T

½Ð¬¢ www.powerlee.com.tw

RE: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

Hi. Firstofall thanks for your help... I've found the HIERSEP-r2.patch for cyrus-imapd-2.0.15.. Unfortunately, after apply this patch it includes references into imapd.c,master.c etc... to namespace.h file... I havn't got this file anywhere, and obviosly, afetr applying this patch cyrus doesn'

Death by 11

I have Cyrus 2.0.16 and postfix installed on a RedHat 7.2 system. About 8-10 times a day, either lmptd or imap will die. Once a thread dies, the server is unusable, and has to be restarted before it will accept any connections. The server currently has only a dozen boxes on it, and transfers abo

Re: Using Cyrus imapd with AFS + KRB5 + krb524d ?

> > >You are correct in that the conflict between openssl and kerberos is a >problem. >I believe CMU's current plan is to let the OpenSSL project change their >conflicting names. Until then I found some information on the list >archive >from a programmer at Duke who has hacked the kerberos stuff a

Re: Using Cyrus imapd with AFS + KRB5 + krb524d ?

Hello, We use AFS but do not have it doing anything for IMAP. Our authentication scheme sounds just like what you want to do however. I've only recently got something to compile and it looks like it will work, but it hasn't been tested extensively yet. Are you putting the user folders in AFS? O