Re: Delivering mail to subfolders

2004-06-04 Thread Sergey Goryachev
- Original Message - From: Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Adi Linden [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 10:25 PM Subject: Re: Delivering mail to subfolders Adi Linden wrote: I have cyrus-imapd setup to work with sendmail-8.12.10. These are

Re: Problems with Cyrus IMAP 2.2.5 on Solaris 9 on production server

2004-06-04 Thread Ian G Batten
On Thu, 03 Jun 2004, Rob Siemborski wrote: Why on earth were you killing processes at random? As a test of the stability of the databases. A database should be able to take the explosive failure of any reader or writer with, at worst, a reconstruction. Consider the scenario when the machine

Re: Problems with Cyrus IMAP 2.2.5 on Solaris 9 on production server

2004-06-04 Thread Ian G Batten
On Thu, 03 Jun 2004, Rob Siemborski wrote: I'll also ask the obvious -- did you subsequently stop the server and run recovery on the database? Well, master couldn't prefork anything, citing an inability to read mailboxes.db. As reconstruct -m is currently unavailable I used reconstruct -p to

Re: saslauthd+pam+pam_ldap VS saslauthd+ldap

2004-06-04 Thread Wang Penghui
Simon Matter wrote: The only problem I see with pam_ldap is with the cyrus-imapd virtual domains. AFAIK it doesn't work for more than one domain because PAM doesn't know about realms. I have got your mean, if i want to add the virtual domains support to cyrus-imapd, I have no choice to use

Delivery to shared folders

2004-06-04 Thread Kent L. Nasveschuk
I still can't seem to get this to work. imad.conf configdirectory: /var/imap partition-default: /var/spool/imap admins: cyrus root sasl_mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd autocreatequota: 1 allowanonymouslogin: no allowplaintext: yes createonlogin:

Re: saslauthd+pam+pam_ldap VS saslauthd+ldap

2004-06-04 Thread Igor Brezac
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Wang Penghui wrote: Simon Matter wrote: The only problem I see with pam_ldap is with the cyrus-imapd virtual domains. AFAIK it doesn't work for more than one domain because PAM doesn't know about realms. I have got your mean, if i want to add the virtual domains

Re: Problems with Cyrus IMAP 2.2.5 on Solaris 9 on production server

2004-06-04 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Ian G Batten wrote: On Thu, 03 Jun 2004, Rob Siemborski wrote: I'll also ask the obvious -- did you subsequently stop the server and run recovery on the database? Well, master couldn't prefork anything, citing an inability to read mailboxes.db. As reconstruct -m is currently

Strange problem authenticating

2004-06-04 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
Here is a strange one. I have 3 machines. 1 (Mercury): Cyrus IMAP 2.1.13, Cyrus SASL 2.1.13, Tru64 UNIX 4.0D 2 (EDKI):Cyrus IMAP 2.1.13, Cyrus SASL 2.1.15, Tru64 UNIX 4.0D 3 (Legba): Cyrus IMAP 2.2.5, Cyrus SASL 2.1.18, Tru64 UNIX 5.1B Machines 1 and 2 are working fine, cyradm and imtest

Re: Problems with Cyrus IMAP 2.2.5 on Solaris 9 on production server

2004-06-04 Thread Ian G Batten
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004, Rob Siemborski wrote: I ment ctl_cyrusdb -r. I thought that was run automatically when master started? ian --- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

Temprary failture when the MDA(mailbox_transport = cyrus) deliver message.

2004-06-04 Thread Wang Penghui
Hi, Thank you for reading this message! I have built up a mail server with Postfix+Cyrus-SASL+Cyrus-IMAPd+OpenLDAP. All the auth motheds are saslauthd with ldap. And i have configure the imap server to support virtual domains in the imapd.conf. My imapd.conf is follow configdirectory:

Re: Temprary failture when the MDA(mailbox_transport = cyrus) deliver message.

2004-06-04 Thread Igor Brezac
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Wang Penghui wrote: Hi, Thank you for reading this message! I have built up a mail server with Postfix+Cyrus-SASL+Cyrus-IMAPd+OpenLDAP. All the auth motheds are saslauthd with ldap. And i have configure the imap server to support virtual domains in the imapd.conf. My

Re: Temprary failture when the MDA(mailbox_transport = cyrus) delivermessage.

2004-06-04 Thread Simon Matter
Hi, Thank you for reading this message! I have built up a mail server with Postfix+Cyrus-SASL+Cyrus-IMAPd+OpenLDAP. All the auth motheds are saslauthd with ldap. And i have configure the imap server to support virtual domains in the imapd.conf. My imapd.conf is follow configdirectory:

Re: saslauthd+pam+pam_ldap VS saslauthd+ldap

2004-06-04 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Simon Matter wrote: I'm using both versions on different servers and I can say they both work very well for me. The pam way is more flexible if you have more than one place where users are stored, say LDAP and MySQL, or you want to restrict logins by other means like time or

Re: Strange problem authenticating

2004-06-04 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
Nikola Milutinovic wrote: Here is a strange one. I tried running saslpasswd2 and sasldblistusers2. They both crash AFTER performing the task, it looks like this: Papa-Legba:/# sasldblistusers2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: cmusaslsecretOTP [EMAIL PROTECTED]: userPassword nxm_upcall: can't grow stack, pid

ÄúµÄÂ¥¶¥ÈÈÂð£¿

2004-06-04 Thread ׿¹¤³Ìʦ
. . . . :www.suwa-china.com . : . . . QQ:20736818 . 020-87065258 020-88306650 . -- . . . . . .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 . . . . . . . http://remove.6456.com

ÄúµÄÂ¥¶¥ÈÈÂð£¿

2004-06-04 Thread ׿¹¤³Ìʦ
. . . . :www.suwa-china.com . : . . . QQ:20736818 . 020-87065258 020-88306650 . -- . . . . . .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 . . . . . . . http://remove.6456.com

cyradm and unknown mode error when starting up

2004-06-04 Thread Shawn Sivy
**I just started getting the errors below when starting cyradm (was using cyradm without a problem for days). % cyradm localhost IMAP Password: unknown mode:

Re: cyradm and unknown mode error when starting up

2004-06-04 Thread Shawn Sivy
Nevermind. Seems to have been some terminal setting/termcap issue. I logged all the way out, closed the SSH client and when all the way back in and the message is gone now. What was weird was it happened on two different SSH sessions at the same time. -Shawn Shawn Sivy wrote: **I just