Hi,
Quoting Nikola Milutinovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Now, one question that is a bit off topic, why is NFSv4 locking so
bad? Couldn't they (Powers that Be) fix it, so it behaves like a
normal (albeit, networked) file system?
As far as i know NFSv4 has the locking support, but nobody has
Hi,
i have to correct some information
Quoting Michael Menge [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Shared filesystem Active/Passive
This setup can add HA to a normal Cyrus server by storing the Mails and
databases on a shared filesystem and monitoring the server with heartbeat.
This setup should work
Hi,
Quoting Gary Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:28:02PM +0100, Michael Menge wrote:
The following shared Filesystems seem support the file-locking
GFShttp://sources.redhat.com/cluster/gfs/
Lustre http://www.lustre.org/
NFSv4
Hi,
Quoting Nikola Milutinovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Now, one question that is a bit off topic, why is NFSv4 locking so
bad? Couldn't they (Powers that Be) fix it, so it behaves like a
normal (albeit, networked) file system?
As far as i know NFSv4 has the locking support, but nobody has
Hello,
We try to build a virtualdomain cyrus server with sendmail. Sendmail
must manage aliases. Here's the goal architecture :
_ the fqdn of our cyrus server is imap.domain.com
_ sendmail on this server must accept messages for both
domain1.domain.com domain2.domain.com dealing with
Hi,
We try to build a virtualdomain cyrus server with sendmail. Sendmail
must manage aliases. Here's the goal architecture :
_ the fqdn of our cyrus server is imap.domain.com
_ sendmail on this server must accept messages for both
domain1.domain.com domain2.domain.com dealing with aliases
Jerome Nenert schrieb:
Hello,
We try to build a virtualdomain cyrus server with sendmail. Sendmail
must manage aliases. Here's the goal architecture :
_ the fqdn of our cyrus server is imap.domain.com
_ sendmail on this server must accept messages for both
domain1.domain.com
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:54:21AM +0100, Jerome Nenert wrote:
Hello,
We try to build a virtualdomain cyrus server with sendmail. Sendmail must
manage
aliases. Here's the goal architecture :
_ the fqdn of our cyrus server is imap.domain.com
_ sendmail on this server must accept
Michael Menge wrote:
I know that this list is not complete so feel free to add more shared
filesystems to the list.
Maybe we should share oure expirience with these filesystems and discus
advantages and disadvantages.
What about Lustre? Anybody has tried this in combination with
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 01:57:44 +0700 (ICT) Johannes Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear list,
I run cyrus 2.1.18 and postfix 2.1.5 on a linux debian box, 2.6.8 kernel.
I use cyrdeliver as a delivery agent for postfix, procmail is not involved.
I am wondering whther it is possible to use
Quoting Yuri Gorshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Michael Menge wrote:
I know that this list is not complete so feel free to add more
shared filesystems to the list.
Maybe we should share oure expirience with these filesystems and
discus advantages and disadvantages.
What about Lustre?
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:36:55AM +0100, Simon Matter wrote:
It has been tested but didn't work. See the posts from some days ago. It's
either a configuration problem with the tests, an NFSv4 implementation
problem with the tested Linux kernel, or something else.
AFAIK there is a known NFSv4
Thanks to all for the suggestions. They were very good so I ignored
them. :)
I've patched imapd.c (cmd_login and cmd_authenticate) so that the
presence and contents of {config_dir}/captive/{username} indicate the
actual user that should be logged in (providing it begins with
disabled).
I would like to know who is interested in helping to develop next
versions of advanced Sendmail and Cyrus IMAP integration methods.
I would like to further improve methods available at links below:
http://anfi.homeunix.net/sendmail/rtcyrus2.html
http://anfi.homeunix.net/sendmail/#cyrus
I
Hi!
While skimming throught the 2.3.7 changes, I found:
--klip--
Changes to the Cyrus IMAP Server since 2.2.x
* Added support for unified and replicated Murders. A Murder no
longer has to have discrete frontend and backend servers; any one
unified server can both proxy and
Hi,
Simon Matter wrote:
I just tried the in-memory NFSv4 server from citi (in newpynfs); it is
very very slow, and I had to lower the number of concurrent users in
imaptest (to prevent 'stalling errors') - but it seems to work better! I
don't get any locking problems in the logs.
So it could
On 29 Nov 2006, at 10:46, Janne Peltonen wrote:
The part '... all replicated servers can serve the same mailboxes
from a
shared filesystem' attracted my attention. Is this the LB that is
reported not
to work with current murder/replication? Or is this something else?
In the replicated
Nik Conwell wrote:
If anybody wants the patch (pretty small) I can send it somewhere
appropriate.
Please, I'd be interested! :)
Ben
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info:
--On Wednesday, November 29, 2006 16:11 +0100 Andrzej Adam Filip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know who is interested in helping to develop next
versions of advanced Sendmail and Cyrus IMAP integration methods.
I would like to further improve methods available at links below:
On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 12:35 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could see this being useful as well for password expirations.
...or billing issues.
MJ
--
Miroslaw Psyborg Jaworski
GCS/IT d- s+:+ a C++$ UBI$ P+++$ L- E--- W++(+++)$ N++ o+ K- w-- O-
M- V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t 5? X+ R++ !tv
I believe there was some mention of this in the past, but I'm wondering
whether there are any known efforts to implement network traffic accounting
in the later versions of Cyrus, or if this is still something that hasn't
been dealt with. I am pondering possibly tackling this, but I'm not
Great summary Michael.
I have a few questions on what a shared filesystem hardware
CAN be:
- iSCSI storage ? (cheap GigaEthernet SAN)
according to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISCSI ,
only 1 iSCSI-client can be connected to 1 iSCSI-server (disk)
at a time...so this does not allow for
- iSCSI storage ? (cheap GigaEthernet SAN)
according to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISCSI ,
only 1 iSCSI-client can be connected to 1 iSCSI-server (disk)
at a time...so this does not allow for a shared FS ?
Yes, much like only one host can connect to an FC LUN at once. :) iSCSI
At Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:52:08 +0100,
Michael Menge wrote:
As far as i know NFSv4 has the locking support, but nobody has tested
it with cyrus till know. All shared filesystems have to deal with the
problem that they need to cache informations to be fast and to get all
changes to keep
At Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:24:44 -0300,
Marcelo Maraboli wrote:
I have a few questions on what a shared filesystem hardware
CAN be:
- iSCSI storage ? (cheap GigaEthernet SAN)
according to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISCSI ,
only 1 iSCSI-client can be connected to 1 iSCSI-server
At Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:56:04 -0500,
Nik Conwell wrote:
Thanks to all for the suggestions. They were very good so I ignored
them. :)
I've patched imapd.c (cmd_login and cmd_authenticate) so that the
presence and contents of {config_dir}/captive/{username} indicate the
actual user
So I finally decided to try actually using SIEVE to allow me some
mobility and separation between my INBOX sorting and my client(s).
However my first experiment (the one taken directly from the
install-sieve.html guide) ended in a minor disaster (because I did it
live on my home mail server, not
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 09:55, Paul Dekkers wrote:
I took some time to try the Linux nfs4 client (RHEL4) with a Solaris 10
nfs4 server (default install) instead of the RHEL4 server. I copied over
my spool, started cyrus... and this is actually more dramatic.
What kernel version is RHEL4
28 matches
Mail list logo
