Great!
A very useful feature in a real multidomain environment I think!
I am currently busy working on logging some IMAP events patching imapd.c. I'll
enforce your patch immediately after that and let you know my results.
Thank you a lot.
P
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Alain Spineux
For confirmation, the problem I had a couple of weeks ago with Cyrus
2.3.10 on a Redhat 8 derived system is fixed by forcing
HAVE_GETGROUPLIST to be undefined (I did it by deleting getgrouplist
from the list of functions checked for in configure --- there's
presumably a cleaner way).
It seems silly to spend all the money for a T2000 with redundancies
and SAN and etc. And then have it choke up when it hits (for us) about
10K users. It seems everyone we talk to scratches their head why this
system with all it's cores would choke. We have found even older Sun
V210 are
--On 8 November 2007 16:50:59 -0600 Gary Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We have a moderate-sized Cyrus system for 30,000 students and 3000
employees. It's a critical service in the sense that thousands of
people depend on it. It has excellent performance, lots of capacity,
and plans for
Hello , I have a problem with Cyrus vacation, it just don't do
nothing, they don't generate any error on the logs, a tested other
Sieve features, like reject and they work.
I tried Cyrus 2.2 and now 2.3.8 and nothing :-(
I already searched a lot in forums and nothing, all the
My director seems interested in outsourcing our e-mail system, judging
by the number of articles on outsourcing that he sends to me. Google
and Zimbra with a commercial contractor are the latest two. Replacing
a perfectly functioning e-mail system seems ludicrous to me, as does
subjecting
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 05:05:39PM -0600, Blake Hudson wrote:
Gary Mills wrote:
We have a moderate-sized Cyrus system for 30,000 students and 3000
employees. ... I know that CMU and other universities want
to maintain their own e-mail systems. What's the justification in
these cases?
How many
and what sort of people does it take to maintain a system such as
this? I need a good argument for hiring a replacement for me.
At a minimum you want 1 qualified person and someone cross-trained
as a backup, so that person can reasonably enough have vacations.
Any decent
Hi,
I had experienced the similar problem. I have got the same error when I
was trying to build cyrus-imapd on my openSUSE 10.2 (X86-64) based system.
Check the messages when you start building cyrus-imapd for these (or
similar) lines:
checking for RSAPublicEncrypt in -lrsaref... yes
checking
Eric Luyten wrote:
Another thought : if your original problem is related to a locking issue
of shared resources, visible upon imapd process termination, the rate of
writing new messages to the spool does not need to be a directly contri-
buting factor.
Were you experiencing the load problem
Jure Pečar wrote:
I'm still on linux and was thinking a lot about trying out solaris 10, but
stories like yours will make me think again about that ...
We are I think an edge case, plenty of people running Solaris Cyrus no
problems.
To me ZFS alone is enough reason to go with Solaris. I
Jure Pečar wrote:
In my expirience the brick wall you describe is what happens when disks
reach a certain point of random IO that they cannot keep up with.
The problem with a technical audience, is that everyone thinks they have
a workaround
or probable fix you haven't already thought of.
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:40:25 -0800
Vincent Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there's something that 3 admins could do to alleviate load we did it.
The bigger problem I am seeing is that Cyrus doesn't in our
usage seem to ramp load smoothly or even predictably. It goes
fine up to a certain
13 matches
Mail list logo
