On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 07:01:13 +0100, Martin Schweizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
( Sorry,again but I did not get an answer until now)
OOps, I thought I had replied...
Sorry about the delay in replying. That just looks like debugging info.
We don't get it, so I wonder if you have a debugging
Hi everybody.
I have some problems with cyr_expire.
Everytime i try to run it (mostlt from cyrus.conf) i get a bus error.
So it means my disk is filling up quickly.
I run 2.3.11, but i have downgraded and tried all versions from 2.3.7 and
i get the same error.
Here is my output,
mail2# su
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Ian G Batten wrote:
software RAID5 is a performance
disaster area at the best of times unless it can take advantage of
intimate knowledge of the intent log in the filesystem (RAID-Z does
this),
actually, unless you have top-notch hardware raid controllers, software
On 05 Mar 08, at 1549, Simon Matter wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Ian G Batten wrote:
software RAID5 is a performance
disaster area at the best of times unless it can take advantage of
intimate knowledge of the intent log in the filesystem (RAID-Z does
this),
actually, unless you have
I try to use quota on INBOX user but not on trash but I have strange
behavior :
cm user.testing
sam user.testing testing all
sq user.testing 30
cm user.testing.Trash
sq user.testing.Trash none
cm user.testing.other
If I have mail in user.testing.other folder (none in INBOX) and if I
make
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Ian G Batten wrote:
On 05 Mar 08, at 1549, Simon Matter wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Ian G Batten wrote:
software RAID5 is a performance
disaster area at the best of times unless it can take advantage of
intimate knowledge of the intent log in the filesystem (RAID-Z does
David Lang wrote:
raid 6 allows you to loose any two disks and keep going.
This is turning into a RAID discussion.
The orginal poster was doing a RAID-5 across 3 disks, and has stopped
commenting but it's probably because that's all the hardware he could
scrounge.
I am a staunch member
Jeff Fookson wrote:
We are planning to run the mirrors
off a 4-port 3ware RAID card even though we're not overly fond of
3ware (we have a fair amount of experience
with RAID5 arrays on 3ware cards on our research machines where they
perform adequately but
not more). We are hoping the
but all attempts to simulate
a client load-pattern are devilishly difficult to get right.
I can atest to this as well.
I created an imapstresstest tool a few years back to attempt to stress our
cyrus installs. It attempts to emulate all the main actions of a running
IMAP server like lots of
Hello Bron
2008/3/5, Bron Gondwana [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OOps, I thought I had replied...
... no worry.
Sorry about the delay in replying. That just looks like debugging info.
We don't get it, so I wonder if you have a debugging level turned on
that we don't.
Here my
10 matches
Mail list logo
