Tcpwrapper does not work?

2010-10-08 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Hello, When I put in my /etc/hosts.deny this: imapd: 192.168.0.41 And /etc/hosts.allow is empty. Then I still get my mail over IMAP from this IP with Cyrus. I use Cyrus 2.2.13 from Debian stable, so far I know this is compiled with tcpwrapper support. Does somebody understand this? With

Re: Tcpwrapper does not work?

2010-10-08 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
Paul van der Vlis wrote: Hello, When I put in my /etc/hosts.deny this: imapd: 192.168.0.41 And /etc/hosts.allow is empty. Then I still get my mail over IMAP from this IP with Cyrus. I use Cyrus 2.2.13 from Debian stable, so far I know this is compiled with tcpwrapper support. Does

Re: Tcpwrapper does not work?

2010-10-08 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) schreef: Paul van der Vlis wrote: Hello, When I put in my /etc/hosts.deny this: imapd: 192.168.0.41 And /etc/hosts.allow is empty. Then I still get my mail over IMAP from this IP with Cyrus. I use Cyrus 2.2.13 from Debian stable, so far I know this is

Re: Tcpwrapper does not work?

2010-10-08 Thread Dave McMurtrie
On 10/08/2010 06:09 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Hello, When I put in my /etc/hosts.deny this: imapd: 192.168.0.41 And /etc/hosts.allow is empty. Then I still get my mail over IMAP from this IP with Cyrus. I use Cyrus 2.2.13 from Debian stable, so far I know this is compiled with

Re: Tcpwrapper does not work?

2010-10-08 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:09:37 +0200 Paul van der Vlis p...@vandervlis.nl said: paul When I put in my /etc/hosts.deny this: imapd: 192.168.0.41 paul And /etc/hosts.allow is empty. paul Then I still get my mail over IMAP from this IP with Cyrus. Isn't the entry `imap: 192.168.0.41'?

Re: Tcpwrapper does not work?

2010-10-08 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Hajimu UMEMOTO schreef: Hi, On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:09:37 +0200 Paul van der Vlis p...@vandervlis.nl said: paul When I put in my /etc/hosts.deny this: imapd: 192.168.0.41 paul And /etc/hosts.allow is empty. paul Then I still get my mail over IMAP from this IP with Cyrus. Isn't the

Re: Tcpwrapper does not work?

2010-10-08 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Dave McMurtrie schreef: On 10/08/2010 06:09 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Hello, When I put in my /etc/hosts.deny this: imapd: 192.168.0.41 And /etc/hosts.allow is empty. Then I still get my mail over IMAP from this IP with Cyrus. I use Cyrus 2.2.13 from Debian stable, so far I know this

Re: Tcpwrapper does not work?

2010-10-08 Thread Gavin McCullagh
Hi, On Fri, 08 Oct 2010, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Strange, in the manual of tcp-wrappers they say you need to use the processname... If you use bacula you'll find the same thing. If you run a bacula file daemon, the process name will be bacula-fd but you might call it doodles in the

Re: Tcpwrapper does not work?

2010-10-08 Thread Dave McMurtrie
On 10/08/2010 07:24 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Dave McMurtrie schreef: On 10/08/2010 06:09 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Hello, When I put in my /etc/hosts.deny this: imapd: 192.168.0.41 And /etc/hosts.allow is empty. Then I still get my mail over IMAP from this IP with Cyrus. I use

Re: Tcpwrapper does not work?

2010-10-08 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Dave McMurtrie schreef: On 10/08/2010 07:24 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Dave McMurtrie schreef: On 10/08/2010 06:09 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Hello, When I put in my /etc/hosts.deny this: imapd: 192.168.0.41 And /etc/hosts.allow is empty. Then I still get my mail over IMAP from this

Fixed: was Re: Authentication problem between 2.3.16 back-end and 2.2.12 mupdate and front-ends

2010-10-08 Thread Michael D. Sofka
Michael D. Sofka wrote: Trying this on the 2.3.16 server, built from Simon Matter's source RPM on a RE5 server I get: Hacker[901]:mupdatetest -v -p 3905 -a g_murder imap-fe1.server.rpi.edu S: * AUTH LOGIN PLAIN S: * STARTTLS S: * PARTIAL-UPDATE S: * OK MUPDATE imap-fe1.server.rpi.edu

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-08 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 02:40:01PM -0400, Michael D. Sofka wrote: But, when I try to move it back to the 2.2.12 back-end the same error message. Is this a cyrus version incompatibility? That is, are the moves one-way, at least when using xfer? Gosh yes. The mailbox internal format has

Re: packages for solaris 10 x86

2010-10-08 Thread Andrew Morgan
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Frank Pittel wrote: Now I'm trying to compile cyrus-imapd and am running into the following error: cyrusMasterMIB.c gcc -L/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib -R/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/lib -o master master.o masterconf.o cyrusMasterMIB.o ../lib/lock_fcntl.o

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-08 Thread Michael D. Sofka
Bron, Thanks for the answer. A one way xfer in fine. I'm just testing the new server, and the migration process. Is the old format updated on xfer? The account I moved is working fine. Mike Bron Gondwana br...@fastmail.fm wrote: On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 02:40:01PM -0400, Michael D. Sofka

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-08 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 12:04:23AM -0400, Michael D. Sofka wrote: Bron, Thanks for the answer. A one way xfer in fine. I'm just testing the new server, and the migration process. Is the old format updated on xfer? The account I moved is working fine. Cyrus will automatically update the