On 07/30/15 16:21 +0100, John wrote:
Hi List,
I have a bunch of shared folders which I want to have various user
permissions on them. I can do the simple read/write ones, but I cannot
work out how to allow a user to delete mails but not the mailbox. A user
has just done it *again* so I need to
Hi List,
I have a bunch of shared folders which I want to have various user
permissions on them. I can do the simple read/write ones, but I cannot
work out how to allow a user to delete mails but not the mailbox. A user
has just done it *again* so I need to get it sorted.
Thanks,
John
I was misreading the RFC and I now understand how one of my users was
able to delete a few gigs of email and folders: the folders had been
migrated from a pre-2.3.0 message store and I hadn't retuned the
permissions on those folders. Having now retested on two 2.4 servers and
a 2.5.4 I am now
Hi,
Thank you for the reply.
Sometimes I see in maillog the following errors:
imap[31724]: SQUAT failed to open index file
imap[31724]: SQUAT failed
And also:
master[24699]: process 19488 exited, signaled to death by 11
master[24699]: service imap pid 19488 in BUSY state: terminated abnormally
RFC 4314 was implemented in 2.3.0 (according to the changes file).
So with 'd' listed, e, t, and x are implied, per the RFC.
This is way out of date date unfortunately:
http://cyrusimap.org/docs/cyrus-imapd/2.5.4/overview.php
Check your 'defaultacl:' option to verify it doesn't contain d.
On
The RFC says it’s c=k+x and d=t+e. I want users to be able to delete
messages (t) but not delete mailboxes (x), so I am applying a permission
of lrswiptek, but when I read it back it shows lrswipktecd:
|localhost lam Not*
NotUser:
anyone lrs
NotUser/Shared1:
bob lrswipktecd
anyone lrs
Errata: RFC says c=k and d=t+e+x, but that doesn't change my problem.
On 30/07/15 19:45, John wrote:
The RFC says it’s c=k+x and d=t+e. I want users to be able to delete
messages (t) but not delete mailboxes (x), so I am applying a
permission of lrswiptek, but when I read it back it shows
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 19:09 +0100, John wrote:
I set the ACL to lrswiptek and it then shows as lrswipktecd. Have I
missed a database migration step at some point in the past? The
current server is running 2.4.12 (and I have a project to move it all
to 2.5.x soon).
Don't use d w if you
I set the ACL to lrswiptek and it then shows as lrswipktecd. Have I
missed a database migration step at some point in the past? The current
server is running 2.4.12 (and I have a project to move it all to 2.5.x
soon).
John
On 30/07/15 16:37, Dan White wrote:
On 07/30/15 16:21 +0100, John wrote:
Hi,
--On 30. Juli 2015 01:17:29 +0300 Dudi Finkel dudi.fin...@atrinet.com
wrote:
db4-4.3.29
The number of lockers was growing for more than a week
Why this is happening?
How can I fix it?
How can I reproduce it?
general consensus is to just get rid of BerkeleyDB. You can use skiplist
10 matches
Mail list logo
