Re: Why Cyrus?

On 01/19/2018 07:50 AM, Nic Bernstein wrote: > I'm sorry, and don't wish to start a flame war here, but can't just let > this comment pass. Fastmail are dedicated to improving the > documentation of Cyrus, and have on staff a person, Nicola Nye > , for that specific

Re: Why Cyrus?

Am Freitag, 19. Januar 2018, 12:29:03 CET schrieb Patrick Goetz: > That makes the choice kind of clear, in my mind. AFAIK Dovecot is > developed by just one person (or at the very least a small team) of > volunteer developers. If he/they get bored and move on to something > else ... Meanwhile,

Re: Why Cyrus?

On 01/19/2018 05:29 AM, Patrick Goetz wrote: The biggest ongoing problem with Cyrus is the documentation, not that it's harder to install.  Cyrus is, if anything, easier to install than Dovecot (modulo distro packaging, which is the main difference here). The Dovecot guy writes very good

Re: Split mailboxes on server migration

Hello, everyone! I come to bring you some good news. Actually the problems I was facing had nothing to do with database stuff at all. It was a single configuration line (DEFAULTDOMAIN) in IMAPD.CONF that was set to DOMAIN.EXAMPLE while it was set to IMAP.DOMAIN.EXAMPLE in the old server

Re: Why Cyrus?

Op 17-01-18 om 12:33 schreef Sebastian Hagedorn: >> Hi, A new customer asks me to build a new mailserver environment with Dovecot. I normally use Cyrus. My question: What's better in Cyrus? This is terribly OCD, but I can't stand the maildir message formatting Dovecot uses. Ugh, how