Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-30 Thread mills
Larry Greenfield writes: I've placed Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 on ftp.andrew. This version adds a couple of new features and some slight code reorganization. We'd love to have people try it out. I hear that my directory hashing patch didn't make it into this release. Will it be in the next one? --

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-29 Thread Dori . Seliskar
Walter Wong wrote: Speaking of Linux, did you do the chattr +S to make the disk writes synchronous? If you are willing to lose data on a crash, you may want to see if performance improves by changing that. If you aren't willing to lose data on a crash, maybe you can see if resierfs performs

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-28 Thread Helmut Apfelholz
Thank you for the answer. --- Walter Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Helmut Apfelholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: this is greate that the development of the server is moving along. I hope that you guys at cmu also watch to mailing list, and have seen the 'forking problem' that ppl here

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Michael Fair
Greenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: info-cyrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 3:51 PM Subject: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released I've placed Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 on ftp.andrew. This version adds a couple of new features and some slight code reorganization. We'd love to have people try

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Helmut Apfelholz
Hi, this is greate that the development of the server is moving along. I hope that you guys at cmu also watch to mailing list, and have seen the 'forking problem' that ppl here have been describing. We will try to test the newest release and will report ASAP if the problem persists or not. Thank

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Amos Gouaux
I was wondering if perhaps the maxchild parameter was inspired, at least in part, to keep a check on processes like lmtpd from getting so numerous that the possibility of contention increases. Though, that's just a wild guess On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 03:55:41 -0700 (PDT), Helmut Apfelholz

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Larry M. Rosenbaum
I've placed Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 on ftp.andrew. This version adds a couple of new features and some slight code reorganization. We'd love to have people try it out. I noticed that pop3d.c now has some APOP code. Does that mean there's a new version of Cyrus SASL containing the sasl_checkapop()

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread rj45
this forking problem is related only in the case of Linux environment ? I have not noticed it on FreeBSD. thanks Rick On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Helmut Apfelholz wrote: Hi, this is greate that the development of the server is moving along. I hope that you guys at cmu also watch to mailing

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Ken Murchison
Larry M. Rosenbaum wrote: I've placed Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 on ftp.andrew. This version adds a couple of new features and some slight code reorganization. We'd love to have people try it out. I noticed that pop3d.c now has some APOP code. Does that mean there's a new version of Cyrus

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Walter Wong
Helmut Apfelholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: this is greate that the development of the server is moving along. I hope that you guys at cmu also watch to mailing list, and have seen the 'forking problem' that ppl here have been describing. Yes, we read the mailing lists but have been busy

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Joel M. Baldwin
I've had a problem that might be in under FBSD 3.5stable. I haven't implemented Cyrus yet, but under load testing I see a large number of sendmail processes that are in a Client Greeting state. I presume that sendmail is trying to talk to lmtpd and not getting a response. I've gotten around

Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-26 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
I've placed Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 on ftp.andrew. This version adds a couple of new features and some slight code reorganization. We'd love to have people try it out. Of especial interest may be the partial virtual domain support via the multiple config files (I'd love a contributed