Re: OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER (Was: Cyrus SASL 2.1.10 Released)

2002-12-10 Thread Peter 'Luna' Runestig
Ken Murchison wrote: OK. I now have two conflicting reports regarding testing for OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER with OpenSSL 0.9.7 (both quoted below). Could somebody who has 0.9.7 installed please try to figure out what the deal is? I tend to believe that I was originally correct in including the

Re: OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER (Was: Cyrus SASL 2.1.10 Released)

2002-12-10 Thread Peter 'Luna' Runestig
Peter 'Luna' Runestig wrote: Unfortunately, I don't have a OBSD 3.2 around to test on... I have done some tests on OBSD 3.1, and it behaves the same as my RH 7.2 system. Tested both with OBSD 3.1 native OpenSSL 0.9.6b [engine], and with 0.9.7-beta3 (built on the system using OpenSSL's code

Re: OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER (Was: Cyrus SASL 2.1.10 Released)

2002-12-10 Thread Ken Murchison
Oops! I pulled the wrong SASL address out of my address book. Please do not send any more replies to ietf-sasl. Ken Peter 'Luna' Runestig wrote: Ken Murchison wrote: OK. I now have two conflicting reports regarding testing for OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER with OpenSSL 0.9.7 (both quoted

Re: OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER (Was: Cyrus SASL 2.1.10 Released)

2002-12-10 Thread Hack Kampbjørn
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 15:16, Ken Murchison wrote: Oops! I pulled the wrong SASL address out of my address book. Please do not send any more replies to ietf-sasl. Ken Peter 'Luna' Runestig wrote: Ken Murchison wrote: OK. I now have two conflicting reports regarding testing for

Re: OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER (Was: Cyrus SASL 2.1.10 Released)

2002-12-10 Thread Ken Murchison
Hack Kampbjørn wrote: On Tuesday 10 December 2002 15:16, Ken Murchison wrote: Oops! I pulled the wrong SASL address out of my address book. Please do not send any more replies to ietf-sasl. Ken Peter 'Luna' Runestig wrote: Ken Murchison wrote: OK. I now have two

Re: OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER (Was: Cyrus SASL 2.1.10 Released)

2002-12-10 Thread Ken Murchison
Hack Kampbjørn wrote: On Tuesday 10 December 2002 15:16, Ken Murchison wrote: Oops! I pulled the wrong SASL address out of my address book. Please do not send any more replies to ietf-sasl. Ken Peter 'Luna' Runestig wrote: Ken Murchison wrote: OK. I now have two

Re: OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER (Was: Cyrus SASL 2.1.10 Released)

2002-12-10 Thread Peter 'Luna' Runestig
Ken Murchison wrote: --- otp.c.orig Mon Oct 14 21:39:43 2002 +++ otp.c Tue Dec 10 16:31:36 2002 @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ #include assert.h #include openssl/evp.h +#include openssl/md5.h #include sasl.h #define MD5_H /* suppress internal MD5 */ So, if Peter can confirm that this works

Re: Cyrus SASL 2.1.10 Released

2002-12-09 Thread Hack Kampbjorn
Hack Kampbjorn wrote: Rob Siemborski wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'd like to announce the release of Cyrus SASL 2.1.10 on ftp.andrew.cmu.edu. This version corrects a number of DIGEST-MD5 interoperability issues, as well as corrects some potential buffer overflows. It

Re: OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER (Was: Cyrus SASL 2.1.10 Released)

2002-12-09 Thread Ken Murchison
OK. I now have two conflicting reports regarding testing for OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER with OpenSSL 0.9.7 (both quoted below). Could somebody who has 0.9.7 installed please try to figure out what the deal is? I tend to believe that I was originally correct in including the check, and I'm confused