of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
As someone who answers many help requests for cyrus (and I'm very far
from the only one), I can honestly say I've never seen a requests
from you. Perhaps you've had a lot of occasion to ask for help
Ian G Batten a écrit :
the mail, the indices, and the mailboxes.db. Each can be on
separate storage with optimal price vs performance characteristics
for the proposed load.
We have 48000 mailboxes on behalf of 2000 users, with typically 1700
imapd processes during the day and ~1000
Mathieu Kretchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian G Batten a écrit :
We have mailboxes.db and the metapartitions on ZFS, along with the zone
iteself. The pool is drawn from space on four 1rpm SAS drives
internal to the machine:
To give (hopefully) comparable comparison:
We have our meta
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Wesley Craig wrote:
On 13 Aug 2008, at 10:31, kbajwa wrote:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
As someone who answers many help requests
Pascal Gienger a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok thanks ! A good point on the cyrus side !
What about the performance ?
Depends on which size your scenario will be.
Does my next configuration will run correctly ? Which hardware should I
buy for this activity ?
Mathieu Kretchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thanks you for your participation but not for the way you do it because
if you had read my second mail on this topic you wouldn't have to ask
your crystal sphere to wonder what is my configuration !!
I did miss your 2nd post, I am sorry.
J'ai
Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
Alain Spineux a écrit :
2008/8/11 Mathieu Kretchner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
First of all : forgive me for my poor English
Hello all,
I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the
only
solutions that could fit our needs.
Unfortunately I really
the mail, the indices, and the mailboxes.db. Each can be on
separate storage with optimal price vs performance characteristics
for the proposed load.
We have 48000 mailboxes on behalf of 2000 users, with typically 1700
imapd processes during the day and ~1000 overnight. There's about
Pascal Gienger a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thanks you for your participation but not for the way you do it because
if you had read my second mail on this topic you wouldn't have to ask
your crystal sphere to wonder what is my configuration !!
I did miss your 2nd
Tornoci Laszlo a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
Alain Spineux a écrit :
2008/8/11 Mathieu Kretchner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
First of all : forgive me for my poor English
Hello all,
I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the
only
solutions that could fit our needs.
Hello:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
My personal experience.
Kirt
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http
kbajwa a écrit :
Hello:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
My personal experience.
Kirt
I guess you've right but I can't post this answer at Cyrus mailing list
Mathieu Kretchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kbajwa a écrit :
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
I guess you've right but I can't post this answer at Cyrus mailing list.
I'm just trying to have my own opinion of imap server and I already have
sarcastic answer on the cyrus mailing list !
On 13 Aug 2008, at 10:31, kbajwa wrote:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
As someone who answers many help requests for cyrus (and I'm very far
from the only
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 01:07:34PM -0400, Wesley Craig wrote:
On 13 Aug 2008, at 10:31, kbajwa wrote:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
As someone who
Hi,
Quoting Mathieu Kretchner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wesley Craig a écrit :
On 11 Aug 2008, at 08:57, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
what is in use now ?
Cyrus
Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Are you having a problem with Cyrus? Migrating from any server to
any other is likely
Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
The real question is because we have only 2 options :
Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Features like delayed expunge, message expiration, etc... that allow you
to have a managed mail store. Cyrus is the only Open Source IMAP/POP
server I know of
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 12:53 +0200, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
The real question is because we have only 2 options :
Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Features like delayed expunge, message expiration, etc... that allow you
to have a managed mail
Mathieu Kretchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok thanks ! A good point on the cyrus side !
What about the performance ?
Depends on which size your scenario will be.
Does my next configuration will run correctly ? Which hardware should I
buy for this activity ?
That's like asking a crystal
Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 12:53 +0200, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
The real question is because we have only 2 options :
Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Features like delayed expunge, message expiration, etc... that allow you
Adam Tauno Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have allot of users and allot of mail you are going to have allot
of I/O. No way around that, regardless of the server. Cyrus' indexes
headers better now, so that might help. But you still need adequate
through-put. I've found that
On 12 Aug 2008, at 06:53, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
At present, we have a lot of I/O, we wonder if the last version of
cyrus is improved for this point ?
Recent versions have several features designed to allow very large
scaling of I/O. In addition to optimization to the old architecture,
First of all : forgive me for my poor English
Hello all,
I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the
only solutions that could fit our needs.
Unfortunately I really don't know cyrus and I would like to have some of
its assets.
Here are the properties of the versus
2008/8/11 Mathieu Kretchner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
First of all : forgive me for my poor English
Hello all,
I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the only
solutions that could fit our needs.
Unfortunately I really don't know cyrus and I would like to have some of its
Alain Spineux a écrit :
2008/8/11 Mathieu Kretchner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
First of all : forgive me for my poor English
Hello all,
I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the only
solutions that could fit our needs.
Unfortunately I really don't know cyrus and I would
On 11 Aug 2008, at 08:57, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
what is in use now ?
Cyrus
Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Are you having a problem with Cyrus? Migrating from any server to
any other is likely to be challenging (to say the least), so you
ought to have a pretty
The real question is because we have only 2 options :
Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Features like delayed expunge, message expiration, etc... that allow you
to have a managed mail store. Cyrus is the only Open Source IMAP/POP
server I know of with any capacity to support
Wesley Craig a écrit :
On 11 Aug 2008, at 08:57, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
what is in use now ?
Cyrus
Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Are you having a problem with Cyrus? Migrating from any server to any
other is likely to be challenging (to say the least), so you ought to
28 matches
Mail list logo
