Re: RE: Importing Mails without to header

2008-02-18 Thread Phil Chambers
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:31:27 -0500 Larry Rosenbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is valid: To: undisclosed recipients :; This is not: To: undisclosed recipients I would say that the former is not actually valid, though the syntax looks correct. RFC2822 section

Re: Importing Mails without to header

2008-02-18 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 15 February 2008 17:18:26 + Phil Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is valid: To: undisclosed recipients :; This is not: To: undisclosed recipients I would say that the former is not actually valid, though the syntax looks correct. RFC2822 section 3.6.3

Re: Importing Mails without to header

2008-02-15 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 14 February 2008 11:12:02 -0500 Joseph Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Situation: an old user has a mail in his account, that was sent _only_ to bcc: People, so in to: you will only find undisclosed recipients. Check what is really in the message. Some mail programs display the

Re: Importing Mails without to header

2008-02-15 Thread Phil Chambers
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:12:02 -0500 Joseph Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Situation: an old user has a mail in his account, that was sent _only_ to bcc: People, so in to: you will only find undisclosed recipients. Check what is really in the message. Some mail programs display the

RE: Importing Mails without to header

2008-02-15 Thread Larry Rosenbaum
This is valid: To: undisclosed recipients :; This is not: To: undisclosed recipients I would say that the former is not actually valid, though the syntax looks correct. RFC2822 section 3.6.3 says that To:, Cc: and Bcc: must contain at least one address. Not exactly.

Re: Importing Mails without to header

2008-02-15 Thread Joseph Brennan
--On Friday, February 15, 2008 5:18 PM + Phil Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is valid: To: undisclosed recipients :; This is not: To: undisclosed recipients I would say that the former is not actually valid, though the syntax looks correct. RFC2822 section

Importing Mails without to header

2008-02-14 Thread Michael Polenske
Hello, we are in the middle of a migration of an old mailserver, and during mailimport from old system we can see a problem. Situation: an old user has a mail in his account, that was sent _only_ to bcc: People, so in to: you will only find undisclosed recipients. When we now try to import

Re: Importing Mails without to header

2008-02-14 Thread Michael Menge
Hi, we had similar problems importing e-mails via IMAP from an old UW-IMAP System. We found that the to: undisclosed recipients was not the problem, but lines beginnig with From or Headerlines with an linbreake. We removed/repaired the corroup heades in the old Mailboxes Telemitrie logging was

Re: Importing Mails without to header

2008-02-14 Thread Michael Polenske
Hi Joseph, the worst information is that we have not really a possibility to change the mail that should be migrated. We do a migration from Lotus Notes, and because we were not able to find tools for migrations mails from Notes to Imap (imap on Notes is not switched on) we use a tool that

Re: Importing Mails without to header

2008-02-14 Thread Joseph Brennan
Situation: an old user has a mail in his account, that was sent _only_ to bcc: People, so in to: you will only find undisclosed recipients. Check what is really in the message. Some mail programs display the null address in modified form. This is valid: To: undisclosed recipients :;