We have clients which issue LIST * when they start up. We think
we need them to do this, because we are making quite heavy use of
shared mailboxes so a mailbox may arrive in a hierarchy other than
INBOX.* to which the user should subscribe.
We have ~35K mailboxes (as reported by
Joseph Brennan wrote:
--On Tuesday, October 9, 2007 14:19 +0100 Ian G Batten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have ~35K mailboxes (as reported by ctl_mboxlist -d | wc -l), and
the LIST takes upwards of 5 minutes. The imapd spins as much CPU as
it can get hold of, too.
We have
What's your authentication authorization infrastructure look like?
Every mailbox has an associated ACL, which must be canonicalized to
determine whether the user in question gets to see it. ctl_mboxlist
just lists whatever it finds. I've seen Kerberos cause LIST * to
take a long time
On 09 Oct 07, at 1550, Wesley Craig wrote:
What's your authentication authorization infrastructure look like?
sasl into yellow pages.
Every mailbox has an associated ACL, which must be canonicalized to
determine whether the user in question gets to see it.
ctl_mboxlist just lists
On 09 Oct 07, at 1522, Blake Hudson wrote:
Sorry this doesn't help solve your problem but it proves it should
be a lot faster than that.
Joseph Brennan
Columbia University Information Technology
Could database type differences (or contention) be an issue here? What
database format are
On 09 Oct 07, at 1522, Blake Hudson wrote:
Could database type differences (or contention) be an issue here? What
database format are each of you using?
Yes. With skiplist (took me several stabs at it to get the
conversion to work) it takes 0.19s. Versus ~250s with BDB. A slight
On 09 Oct 07, at 1748, Ian G Batten wrote:
On 09 Oct 07, at 1522, Blake Hudson wrote:
Could database type differences (or contention) be an issue here?
What
database format are each of you using?
Yes. With skiplist (took me several stabs at it to get the
conversion to work) it takes
Ian G Batten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09 Oct 07, at 1522, Blake Hudson wrote:
Could database type differences (or contention) be an issue here? What
database format are each of you using?
Yes. With skiplist (took me several stabs at it to get the
conversion to work) it takes 0.19s.
