On 21 Feb 2003, James Miller writes:
> Would the LOGFILE statement go into the .procmailrc recipe?
Yes. Running the command "man procmailrc" will provide more details,
if you need them.
> It seems to me LMTPD is rejecting the messages because of header
> problems.
Only because what you are sen
James Miller wrote:
>
> Would the LOGFILE statement go into the .procmailrc recipe? Also, I have
> MIMEDefang (calling SpamAssassin and ClamAV virus scanner). Here are some
> of the headers that get added to all of our mail.
>
> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mime
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, James Miller wrote:
> Are there any know issues between cyrus and mimedefang?
I run cyrus, sendmail, and MIMEDefang. I use the cyrusv2 mailer though,
I don't use procmail. I've used it with procmail too, but it's been a
while...
( and yes, the LOGFILE= part would go in the
Would the LOGFILE statement go into the .procmailrc recipe? Also, I have
MIMEDefang (calling SpamAssassin and ClamAV virus scanner). Here are some
of the headers that get added to all of our mail.
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.
Original Message-
> From: Tarjei Huse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 17:15
> To: Francesc Guasch
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: back to lmtpd problems (ot)
>
> > and I've been using it in many servers happilly
Should I use avcheck instead of avpkeeper with sendmail as well, or that's
just for postfix?
-Original Message-
From: Tarjei Huse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 17:15
To: Francesc Guasch
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: back to lmt
> and I've been using it in many servers happilly. It supports cyrus,
> lmtpd and avp.
Note however that you should not use avpkeeper, but instead the programe avcheck
made by Ralf Hildebrandt. It offers better performance and higher security.
Also, I only had problems combining avpkeeper and post
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 13:20
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: back to lmtpd problems
Nick Ustinov ha escrito:
>
> It's Linux RedHat 7.0 with kernel 2.4.2-0.1.28smp running at dual p3/550
> and the system launches approx the same number
Nick Ustinov ha escrito:
>
> It's Linux RedHat 7.0 with kernel 2.4.2-0.1.28smp running at dual p3/550
> and the system launches approx the same number of lmtpds.
>
> The e-mails are being delivered, but EXTREMELY slow. I don't know where the
> problem is, however the system is unable to deliver
I've discussed this problem some time ago, known as forking problem. Turned
out to be db3 locking problem or whatever. Anyway, here's something I
experience right now:
Let me begin with my system description.
It's Linux RedHat 7.0 with kernel 2.4.2-0.1.28smp running at dual p3/550
with 768 mb ra
10 matches
Mail list logo
