Re: Question about reconstruct

2010-01-13 Thread Wil Cooley
Bron Gondwana wrote: Perhaps it would be a good idea, then, to make the '-k' behavior the default and use another option to invert the logic? Absolutely... it will probably happen in 2.4 or 2.5... it's on my list of incompatible changes! Great, glad to hear it! Wil signature.asc

Re: Question about reconstruct

2010-01-12 Thread wcooley
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 16:24 -0200, Sergio Belkin wrote: From the Cyrus chapter of WMOGAG: quote The most important options for reconstruct are -r and -k. The -r option causes reconstruct to reindex the specified mailbox and all subordinate mailboxes, otherwise child mailboxes are not

Re: Question about reconstruct

2010-01-12 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:57:28AM -0800, wcoo...@nakedape.cc wrote: On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 16:24 -0200, Sergio Belkin wrote: From the Cyrus chapter of WMOGAG: quote The most important options for reconstruct are -r and -k. The -r option causes reconstruct to reindex the specified

Re: Question about reconstruct

2010-01-12 Thread Brian Awood
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 18:15:29 Bron Gondwana wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:57:28AM -0800, wcoo...@nakedape.cc wrote: Perhaps it would be a good idea, then, to make the '-k' behavior the default and use another option to invert the logic? Absolutely... it will probably happen in

Question about reconstruct

2010-01-04 Thread Sergio Belkin
Hi, happy new year. My question is: When should I use -f flag on command reconstruct, and when should not I use it? Thanks in advance! -- -- Open Kairos http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com Sergio Belkin - Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/

Re: Question about reconstruct

2010-01-04 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 16:24 -0200, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, happy new year. My question is: When should I use -f flag on command reconstruct, and when should not I use it? From the Cyrus chapter of WMOGAG: quote The most important options for reconstruct are “-r” and “-k”. The “-r” option

Re: Question about reconstruct behavior

2004-08-16 Thread Ken Murchison
Shawn Sivy wrote: Is it safe to use reconstruct while the cyrus system is up and people are accessing mailfolders, delivering mail, etc? Yes. Does reconstruct lock the mailbox it is reconstructing so no updates can be made during that time? Yes. Thanks, -Shawn --- Cyrus Home Page:

Question about reconstruct behavior

2004-08-15 Thread Shawn Sivy
Is it safe to use reconstruct while the cyrus system is up and people are accessing mailfolders, delivering mail, etc? Does reconstruct lock the mailbox it is reconstructing so no updates can be made during that time? Thanks, -Shawn --- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus

Re: Question about reconstruct and main mailbox

2003-01-06 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
--On Saturday, January 04, 2003 11:56 AM -0800 Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I'm looking at upgrading from a Cyrus 1.5 to a more current Cyrus Imap, and have noticed that the 'reconstruct -m' function is not implemented. I think we know that things happen. Is there any way in version

Question about reconstruct and main mailbox

2003-01-04 Thread Doug
Hi! I'm looking at upgrading from a Cyrus 1.5 to a more current Cyrus Imap, and have noticed that the 'reconstruct -m' function is not implemented. I think we know that things happen. Is there any way in version 2.1.* to build a new 'mailboxes' database if it gets corrupted? Thanks! Doug