On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:38:56PM -0400, Matt Elson wrote:
> > So the exact text after the OK response doesn't matter, but it MUST
> > be SP followed by at least 1 TEXT-CHAR.
> >
> > This is pretty easy to patch in 2.3.x if you're forced to remain
> > there for reasons. It is, of course, fixed
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 09:37:28AM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> >
> > If they are thinking that the example in the RFC is the specification, they
> > are
> > not correct. The IMAP server responses to determine completion of the
> > EXPUNGE
> > command are "OK" for a completed EXPUNGE, "NO" for
Sorry, in phone so not able to look at code today. So from this it appears that
calling expunge frequently will still happen. Recent 2.4 and later will be the
same, but expunge with no changes to make is cheap on more recent Cyrus and
won't even cause a sync log.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at
> So the exact text after the OK response doesn't matter, but it MUST
> be SP followed by at least 1 TEXT-CHAR.
>
> This is pretty easy to patch in 2.3.x if you're forced to remain
> there for reasons. It is, of course, fixed in later versions.
>
> Bron.
>
>
I'm seeing this issue in my
On Tue, October 13, 2015 3:26 pm, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> The El Capitan Mac Mail was recently released. It definitely has a problem.
> We saw our typical sync log size go from 10k when busy to 100k+. We are going
> to recommend that people wait to upgrade to that release until the problem is
>
On Oct 23, 2015, at 2:03 PM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:59:08PM +0200, Eric Luyten wrote:
>> On Tue, October 13, 2015 3:26 pm, k...@rice.edu wrote:
>>
>>> The El Capitan Mac Mail was recently released. It definitely has a problem.
>>> We saw our typical sync log size go
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:59:08PM +0200, Eric Luyten wrote:
> On Tue, October 13, 2015 3:26 pm, k...@rice.edu wrote:
>
> > The El Capitan Mac Mail was recently released. It definitely has a problem.
> > We saw our typical sync log size go from 10k when busy to 100k+. We are
> > going
> > to
On Fri, October 23, 2015 11:03 pm, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> I am looking into generating an rpm
> with a patch.
Ken,
Feel free to throw a 'diff' file in my general direction, even when
generated against another 2.3 version.
I compile from source because of two small site specific patches.
Could
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:54:28PM +0200, Eric Luyten wrote:
> On Thu, October 22, 2015 10:39 pm, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:32:40AM -0400, bacon wrote:
> >
> >> Apple released OS 10.11.1 update yesterday. It shows that it includes,
> >>
> >>
> >> - Fixes an issue where
On Thu, October 22, 2015 10:39 pm, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:32:40AM -0400, bacon wrote:
>
>> Apple released OS 10.11.1 update yesterday. It shows that it includes,
>>
>>
>> - Fixes an issue where outgoing server information may be missing from
>> Mail
>> - Resolves an
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:32:40AM -0400, bacon wrote:
> Apple released OS 10.11.1 update yesterday. It shows that it includes,
>
> - Fixes an issue where outgoing server information may be missing from
> Mail
> - Resolves an issue that prevented display of messages and mailboxes in
> Mail
>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015, at 08:39, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:54:28PM +0200, Eric Luyten wrote:
> > On Thu, October 22, 2015 10:39 pm, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:32:40AM -0400, bacon wrote:
> > >
> > >> Apple released OS 10.11.1 update yesterday.
Apple released OS 10.11.1 update yesterday. It shows that it includes,
- Fixes an issue where outgoing server information may be missing from
Mail
- Resolves an issue that prevented display of messages and mailboxes in
Mail
Does anyone know if this fixed the problem. I've asked my users not
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, at 00:22, Eric Luyten wrote:
> On Thu, October 15, 2015 1:34 am, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
> > Absolutely no idea. I think we have an upgraded test mac here in the
> > office. I'll set it up and see what it does.
>
>
> https://discussions.apple.com/thread/7267399
Yep, I
On Thu, October 15, 2015 1:34 am, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Absolutely no idea. I think we have an upgraded test mac here in the
> office. I'll set it up and see what it does.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/7267399
Eric.
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List
On Tue, October 13, 2015 10:43 pm, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015, at 00:26, k...@rice.edu wrote:
>
>> The El Capitan Mac Mail was recently released. It definitely has a problem.
>> We saw our typical sync log size go from 10k when busy to 100k+. We are
>> going to recommend that
On Tue, October 13, 2015 10:43 pm, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015, at 00:26, k...@rice.edu wrote:
>
>> The El Capitan Mac Mail was recently released. It definitely has a problem.
>> We saw our typical sync log size go from 10k when busy to 100k+. We are
>> going to recommend that
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015, at 22:49, Eric Luyten wrote:
> On Wed, October 14, 2015 11:55 am, Eric Luyten wrote:
> > On Tue, October 13, 2015 10:43 pm, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015, at 00:26, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> The El Capitan Mac Mail was recently released. It
On Wed, October 14, 2015 11:55 am, Eric Luyten wrote:
> On Tue, October 13, 2015 10:43 pm, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015, at 00:26, k...@rice.edu wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The El Capitan Mac Mail was recently released. It definitely has a
>>> problem. We saw our typical sync log size go
Howdy,
In recent weeks I have noticed a number of clients entering seemingly
endless loops writing the cyrus.index on a sometimes empty mailbox,
resulting in several dozen MB/s writing to our mail spool for hours on
end.
Always IMAP, never POP, sometimes TCP/143, mostly TCP/995
I enabled
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:13:43AM +0200, Eric Luyten wrote:
> Howdy,
>
>
> In recent weeks I have noticed a number of clients entering seemingly
> endless loops writing the cyrus.index on a sometimes empty mailbox,
> resulting in several dozen MB/s writing to our mail spool for hours on
> end.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015, at 00:26, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> The El Capitan Mac Mail was recently released. It definitely has a problem.
> We saw our typical sync log size go from 10k when busy to 100k+. We are going
> to recommend that people wait to upgrade to that release until the problem is
>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 07:43:47AM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015, at 00:26, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> > The El Capitan Mac Mail was recently released. It definitely has a problem.
> > We saw our typical sync log size go from 10k when busy to 100k+. We are
> > going
> > to
23 matches
Mail list logo
