Thanks Nic that looks useful
Unfortunately ‘info' doesn’t seem to function on our installation:
localhost> lm shared/mbujobs
shared/mbujobs (\HasChildren)
localhost> lam shared/mbujobs
jt lrswipkxtecda
merlin lrs
anonymous p
ij lrswipkxtecda
localhost> info shared/mbujobs
localhost>
localhost>
On 03/18/2016 05:48 AM, Merlin Hartley via Info-cyrus wrote:
...
Of course, over-time more complexity is always required and I have
recently implemented a few shared mailboxes (rather than just sharing
user mailboxes).
Inevitably, the users are now asking for an auto-reply to be
configured for
We don't use shared mailboxes or non-user sieve at all at FastMail, so
it gets less testing than most things. I'd love to have contributions of
good test cases to Cassandane from someone who knows exactly how this
should work so we can make sieve good for the shared case too.
It's somewhat tricky
Sorry I wasn’t clear: we are using an alias with +plus addressing and lmtp to
deliver into the shared mailbox
I have the shared mailbox working just fine… it is only the sieve on shared
mailboxes that is failing...
aliases file:
mbujobs: +shared/mbujobs
exim router:
imap_shared_accept:
drive
I have had mixed luck with direct mailbox delivery(+ addressing) and
when I say mixed I mean mostly bad.
I wanted to try using it for direct delivery of copies of all sent messages.
I found I needed special permissions on all the mailboxes and duplicate
delivery detection would not work in that
Sieve is run as part of the mail delivery into the mailbox.
That would either be deliver or the lmtp interface.
If your users are dragging and dropping the messages into the shared
mailboxes then I don't believe that you can have sieve run on the mbox
to mbox transfer.
On 03/18/2016 06:48 AM
Greetings
I have been managing our mail domain on a cyrus-imap (&exim) server since 2005
and it has always been great for our ~150 users.
Of course, over-time more complexity is always required and I have recently
implemented a few shared mailboxes (rather than just sharing user mailboxes).
Ine
--On Monday, March 22, 2004 13:22:52 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Craig Ringer wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 02:28, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> It also opens a world of possibility for new bugs. There definately isn't
> a consensus on what the desireable behavior here is.
User
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 02:28, Rob Siemborski wrote:
>
> > It also opens a world of possibility for new bugs. There definately isn't
> > a consensus on what the desireable behavior here is.
>
> User-created sieve loops strike me as one "fun" possibility to
On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 02:28, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> It also opens a world of possibility for new bugs. There definately isn't
> a consensus on what the desireable behavior here is.
User-created sieve loops strike me as one "fun" possibility to be
avoided at all costs.
Craig Ringer
---
Home Pa
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Craig Ringer wrote:
> User-created sieve loops strike me as one "fun" possibility to be
> avoided at all costs.
Well, ok, there's a consensus on *that*.
-Rob
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyert
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Stephen Grier wrote:
> Isn't it the case that for user-space mailboxes, sieve scripts are only
> applied on delivery via LMTP, and not when a message is copied or
> fileintod it? I don't see why the same behaviour wouldn't be adequate
> for shared mailboxes.
It isn't quite th
cases the need was so
pressing for that that I just created the "shared" folder under the
"user." hierarchy.
Any work on Sieve for shared mailboxes would probably start with one
script per mailbox, without inheritance, and would only be processed at
deliver time via LMTP.
Hav
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Stephen Grier wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 01:09, Ken Murchison wrote:
> > The biggest issue with sieve opn shared folders is how to use them. Are
> > they only executed when mail is delivered via LMTP, or are they executed
> > any time a message is inserted into the mailbo
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 01:09, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Stephen Grier wrote:
>
> > What is the current situation with Sieve for shared mailboxes? I've read
> > the discussion from last July on the cyrus-devel list, subject
> > "[PROPOSAL] Sieve for shared mailbox
Stephen Grier wrote:
What is the current situation with Sieve for shared mailboxes? I've read
the discussion from last July on the cyrus-devel list, subject
"[PROPOSAL] Sieve for shared mailboxes", but I can't find any anything
on the subject more recent than this.
Is it st
What is the current situation with Sieve for shared mailboxes? I've read
the discussion from last July on the cyrus-devel list, subject
"[PROPOSAL] Sieve for shared mailboxes", but I can't find any anything
on the subject more recent than this.
Is it still the intention to u
Rob Mueller wrote:
Actually, my intent wasn't to _store_ a script via IMAP ANNOTATEMORE. I
was only intending to _select_ (activate) a script via the annotation.
I still anticipate using MANAGESIEVE to do the upload/download.
Would it be hard to add the ability to store scripts as well? It wou
On 8 Jul 2003, Ken Murchison writes:
> Just out of curiousity, are there any non-eLISP IMAP clients?
Sure, all the ones written in other languages... oh, that's not what
you meant?Parsing that as "(non-e)LISP IMAP clients":
One called PostOffice is at http://opensource.franz.com/postoffice/
> Actually, my intent wasn't to _store_ a script via IMAP ANNOTATEMORE. I
> was only intending to _select_ (activate) a script via the annotation.
> I still anticipate using MANAGESIEVE to do the upload/download.
Would it be hard to add the ability to store scripts as well? It would be
nice to be
Amos Gouaux wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 14:33:53 -0400,
Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (km) writes:
km> IIRC, the original IMAP client written by Mark Crispin was written in LISP.
Hey, some of us still use (e)LISP mail clients, not that I'm
Right. I've been known to use Emacs to read email
> On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 14:33:53 -0400,
> Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (km) writes:
km> IIRC, the original IMAP client written by Mark Crispin was written in LISP.
Hey, some of us still use (e)LISP mail clients, not that I'm
encouraging a client/language debate. Really. ;-)
--
Amos
Stephen L. Ulmer wrote:
Of course if Cyrus IMAPd were implemented in LISP
Now that's old school. ;) I'm sure I've forgotten more about LISP, and
functional languages in general, than I remember.
IIRC, the original IMAP client written by Mark Crispin was written in LISP.
--
Kenneth Murch
Hi Ken,
--On Tuesday, July 8, 2003 11:34 AM -0400 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
|> What about IMAP APPEND? Does that trigger the script? It really ought to
|> as well.
|
| I hadn't anticipated this. What would be the need/advantage of this?
|
There is a huge potential for using sieve
Cyrus Daboo wrote:
Hi Rob,
--On Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:08 AM +1000 Rob Mueller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> True. I hadn't thought about that. This might be worth exploring.
|
| I think this would be great. Personally I found the whole concept of
| having an entirely different protocol
Hi Rob,
--On Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:08 AM +1000 Rob Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
|> True. I hadn't thought about that. This might be worth exploring.
|
| I think this would be great. Personally I found the whole concept of
| having an entirely different protocol to manage sieve scrip
> > Should a script attached to INBOX actually be the users primary
> > (delivery) SIEVE script? If so setting that script via IMAP ANNTATEMORE
> > should have the same effect as doing so via ManageSIEVE.
> >
>
> True. I hadn't thought about that. This might be worth exploring.
I think this woul
> On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 09:59:20 -0400,
> Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (km) writes:
km> Now that Cyrus 2.2 has support for mailbox annotations, I believe
km> that we can provide the functionality that people desire.
I just have to say: WOOHOO!!! :-)
OK, perhaps a little premature, bu
Cyrus Daboo wrote:
Hi Ken,
--On Tuesday, July 8, 2003 9:59 AM -0400 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| In the past, people have requested the ability to run sieve scripts when
| messages are posted directly to shared mailboxes (via +detail
| addressing). I have suggested that this wo
Stephen L. Ulmer wrote:
On 8 Jul 2003, Ken Murchison stated:
In the past, people have requested the ability to run sieve scripts
when messages are posted directly to shared mailboxes (via +detail
addressing). I have suggested that this would be possible by
associating a script with the 'postu
Hi Ken,
--On Tuesday, July 8, 2003 9:59 AM -0400 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| In the past, people have requested the ability to run sieve scripts when
| messages are posted directly to shared mailboxes (via +detail
| addressing). I have suggested that this would be possible by ass
In the past, people have requested the ability to run sieve scripts when
messages are posted directly to shared mailboxes (via +detail
addressing). I have suggested that this would be possible by
associating a script with the 'postuser' (typically "bb" or ""), but
this was deemed unacceptable
32 matches
Mail list logo
