Ken Murchison wrote:
Even if duplicate suppression was turned off, there is no need for the
email to pass back through your MTA and lmtpd again. In fact, you'd get
into an endless loop.
Is this why sieve requires duplicate suppression to be turned on?
--
Larry M.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 02:49:17PM -0600, Gary Mills wrote:
Also note that addresses of more than one virtual domains may map to the
same IMAP mailbox, so the parameter must be multi-valued.
This is a more complicated case. Would multiple configuration files
solve it?
No. You can not
Ken Murchison wrote:
Gary Mills wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 11:21:14AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are running Cyrus IMAP4 v2.1.0pre, from a CVS of a month or so ago.
Some users have sieve scripts that have two `redirect' commands,
one
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:03:45PM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
Gary Mills wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 11:21:14AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
How would we determine that they are redirecting to themselves? You'd
end up getting into the 'vacation' problem of knowing all of the
Gary Mills wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:03:45PM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
Gary Mills wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 11:21:14AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
How would we determine that they are redirecting to themselves? You'd
end up getting into the 'vacation'
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:51:59AM -0600, Gary Mills wrote:
I posted a patch recently that re-qualifies the envelope recipient
with the same domain as used by the MTA.
Not true, your patch does not have any clue about the domain used by
the MTA. What it does might be good for the most simple
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:14:27AM -0500, OCNS Consulting wrote:
What release did you qualify the lmtpengine patch against?
It'll be Cyrus IMAP4 v2.1.0pre, a CVS of a month or two ago.
--
-Gary Mills--Unix Support--U of M Academic Computing and Networking-
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:32:13PM +0100, GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:51:59AM -0600, Gary Mills wrote:
I posted a patch recently that re-qualifies the envelope recipient
with the same domain as used by the MTA.
Not true, your patch does not have any clue about the
We are running Cyrus IMAP4 v2.1.0pre, from a CVS of a month or so ago.
Some users have sieve scripts that have two `redirect' commands,
one specifying another e-mail address, and one specifying their own
e-mail address. Their intention is to forward a copy of the mail
and also deliver a copy to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are running Cyrus IMAP4 v2.1.0pre, from a CVS of a month or so ago.
Some users have sieve scripts that have two `redirect' commands,
one specifying another e-mail address, and one specifying their own
e-mail address. Their intention is to forward a copy of the
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 11:21:14AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are running Cyrus IMAP4 v2.1.0pre, from a CVS of a month or so ago.
Some users have sieve scripts that have two `redirect' commands,
one specifying another e-mail address, and one specifying
Gary Mills wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 11:21:14AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are running Cyrus IMAP4 v2.1.0pre, from a CVS of a month or so ago.
Some users have sieve scripts that have two `redirect' commands,
one specifying another e-mail
12 matches
Mail list logo
