Re: Signalled to death by 11 on imapd?

2001-07-04 Thread Marco Colombo
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, William K. Hardeman wrote: > Howdy all, > > Has anyone found a solution or workaround to the 'signalled to death by 11' > issue with imapd processes? This seems to occur randomly for us, although > more frequently when using a webmail interface than with mulberry or > outlook

Re: Signalled to death by 11 on imapd?

2001-07-02 Thread William K. Hardeman
Ken, Here's what I did, and got. I'm not much of one for using debuggers, so I'm not 100% sure I did what was needed. If there's anything more I can do to help, I'll be glad to do so. (I've got several cores available, too. :) This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux". (gdb) file /usr/cyr

Re: Signalled to death by 11 on imapd?

2001-07-02 Thread Ken Murchison
"William K. Hardeman" wrote: > > Howdy all, > > Has anyone found a solution or workaround to the 'signalled to death by 11' > issue with imapd processes? This seems to occur randomly for us, although > more frequently when using a webmail interface than with mulberry or > outlook 2000. I did a

Signalled to death by 11 on imapd?

2001-07-02 Thread William K. Hardeman
Howdy all, Has anyone found a solution or workaround to the 'signalled to death by 11' issue with imapd processes? This seems to occur randomly for us, although more frequently when using a webmail interface than with mulberry or outlook 2000. I did a gdb core-file on one of the cores produced