Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-19 Thread Voutsinas Nikos
Ken Murchison wrote: I'll let the CMU guys respond for themselves, but the createonpost feature seems problematic if your MTA doesn't verify the legitimacy of the recipient address before passing it to lmtpd. The only way that lmtpd knows if a recipient is allowed or not is if the INBOX for that

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-19 Thread Simon Matter
Voutsinas Nikos schrieb: > > >I like the createonpost feature very much. It makes life easier for > >everybody storing user accounts in LDAP or some kind of DB. No need to > >always call cyradm somehow through webinterface or CLI after creating a > >user in the directory. > > > >Is there a c

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-19 Thread Voutsinas Nikos
>I like the createonpost feature very much. It makes life easier for >everybody storing user accounts in LDAP or some kind of DB. No need to >always call cyradm somehow through webinterface or CLI after creating a >user in the directory. > >Is there a chance this patch makes it into the official so

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-19 Thread Ken Murchison
Simon Matter wrote: > > I like the createonpost feature very much. It makes life easier for > everybody storing user accounts in LDAP or some kind of DB. No need to > always call cyradm somehow through webinterface or CLI after creating a > user in the directory. > > Is there a chance this patc

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-19 Thread Simon Matter
I like the createonpost feature very much. It makes life easier for everybody storing user accounts in LDAP or some kind of DB. No need to always call cyradm somehow through webinterface or CLI after creating a user in the directory. Is there a chance this patch makes it into the official source t

* U5 VirusKill * Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-19 Thread Christos Soulios
26 + >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:34:26 +0000 >From: Christos Soulios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: autocreatequota - does it really work? >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: multipa

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work? [once again]

2002-11-15 Thread Voutsinas Nikos
Please ignore our previous patch ( it only works with the use of some libraries implemented for internal use ). I am sorry for the inconvenience but, beleive me, if you apply the following patch everything will work as Christos promished. So once again: Patch installation: cd into the directory

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-15 Thread Voutsinas Nikos
Let me repost the patch. Patch installation: cd into the directory where cyrus-imapd-2.1.10 resides, and then execute: /usr/local/bin/patch -p0 PS: Once you have applied the patch, please remove the int autocreatequota in cmd_create, otherwise you ll get the following warning imapd.c: In

* U5 VirusKill * Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-15 Thread Christos Soulios
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >using -f >Received: from 195.134.65.216 ( [195.134.65.216]) > as user [EMAIL PROTECTED] by webmail.uoa.gr with HTTP; > Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:34:26 + >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:34:26 + >From: Christos Soulios &

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-15 Thread Christos Soulios
In my opinion features such as autocreate must not be implemented by clients, but by the imap server. This way a lot of problems due to incompatibilities of the various MUAs on the naming of the INBOX subfolders and the policies on the inbox creation are avoided. Below I attach you some patches fo

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-14 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:16:41 -0800 (PST) From: Jonathan Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] The name of the option is potentially confusing, in that the desired mailbox is not 100% *automatically* created. Rather, it is only created when the new user logs in and issues a CREATE INB

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-14 Thread Jonathan Marsden
On 14 Nov 2002, Rob Siemborski writes: > On 14 Nov 2002, Scott Douglass wrote: >> I've been wondering for a while if the /etc/imapd.conf option: >> autocreatequota is actually implemented (I'm running 2.1.9 right >> now). It isn't working on any of my servers. No quota is set for >> new user.na

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-14 Thread Rob Siemborski
On 14 Nov 2002, Scott Douglass wrote: > I've been wondering for a while if the /etc/imapd.conf option: > autocreatequota is actually implemented (I'm running 2.1.9 right now). > It isn't working on any of my servers. No quota is set for new > user.names. > > Anyone have any experience with this? I

autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-14 Thread Scott Douglass
Hi Folks, I've been wondering for a while if the /etc/imapd.conf option: autocreatequota is actually implemented (I'm running 2.1.9 right now). It isn't working on any of my servers. No quota is set for new user.names. Anyone have any experience with this? It would be handy if it did work. -- S