Jorey Bump wrote, On 8/22/2007 8:23 AM:
John Crawford wrote:
Sieve is during delivery to the cyrus store though.
As we have the capability to identify hazards to our
users, I'd like to be able to exercise central
strategies improve their quality of life. So I seek
tools to leverage after
John Crawford wrote:
Sieve is during delivery to the cyrus store though.
As we have the capability to identify hazards to our
users, I'd like to be able to exercise central
strategies improve their quality of life. So I seek
tools to leverage after detection to aid with
removal or
Jorey Bump wrote:
Have you found that the risks justify this effort? Are your ClamAV scans
of the mailstore turning up anything? Are they serious threats?
I've just scanned a mailstore with ClamAV, and about 95% of the 'FOUND'
infected files were false positives. Here there be dragons.
Hello.
What's the best way, and second best way to react to zero-day virus
threats - messages that are delivered to the mail store before the
detection is in place? Is there a best practice that functions nicely
within the cyrus community? Like a perl script that traverses the
mail store (via
John Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way, and second best way to react to zero-day virus
threats - messages that are delivered to the mail store before the
detection is in place?
Refuse mail with executable attachments. List is at:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/262631
John Crawford wrote:
What's the best way, and second best way to react to zero-day virus
threats - messages that are delivered to the mail store before the
detection is in place?
Any detection that can take place in the mail store can (and should) be
moved up the chain, preferably to the
