On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:28:57 -0600,
archive info-cyrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ai) writes:
ai --On Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:24 PM -0800 Jonathan Marsden
ai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ai | So the question becomes: what, if anything can non-CMU people do that
ai | would help cause a release of
Jonathan Marsden wrote:
On 13 Dec 2002, Jure Pecar writes:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:31:41 -0500 Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I addition to what Rob already mentioned, there needs to be more
work done on documenting the virtdomain support and tying some
loose ends.
Yes,
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Ken Murchison wrote:
Its not a matter of CMU needing/using virtdomain support. CMU is not
using altnamespace or unixhiersep stuff in 2.1, and that was released.
Well, yes, but we did have an interest in moving to SASL2. Though I still
agree that what we run internally
On 13 Dec 2002, Jure Pecar writes:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:31:41 -0500 Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I addition to what Rob already mentioned, there needs to be more
work done on documenting the virtdomain support and tying some
loose ends.
Yes, virtdomains are actually the #1
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:31:41 -0500
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I addition to what Rob already mentioned, there needs to be more work
done on documenting the virtdomain support and tying some loose ends.
Yes, virtdomains are actually the #1 thing i'm interested in cyrus 2.2 ...
I'm
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, John Alton Tamplin wrote:
Well, most real databases offer online backup capability so you can get
a robust backup even while processing transactions, and with continuous
log backup a crash can't lose any committed transactions.
But unless the contents of the folders are
Rob Siemborski wrote:
But unless the contents of the folders are backed up in this way too, you
haven't really gained a significant amount, since the transactions that
cyrus needs to make rely on the contents of the filesystem as well.
True, although with the metadata secure you can politely
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, John Alton Tamplin wrote:
Rob Siemborski wrote:
But unless the contents of the folders are backed up in this way too, you
haven't really gained a significant amount, since the transactions that
cyrus needs to make rely on the contents of the filesystem as well.
Hi all,
what is the current status of the cyrus 2.2 cvs branch? judging by the cvs
commits lately, there are just various little cleanups here and there ... is
there anything big left on the TODO list for 2.2?
my little wish would be the sql cyrusdb interface, discussed here a week or
two ago,
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Jure Pecar wrote:
what is the current status of the cyrus 2.2 cvs branch? judging by the cvs
commits lately, there are just various little cleanups here and there ... is
there anything big left on the TODO list for 2.2?
The big one is getting the sieve bytecode support
Jure Pecar wrote:
Hi all,
what is the current status of the cyrus 2.2 cvs branch? judging by the cvs
commits lately, there are just various little cleanups here and there ... is
there anything big left on the TODO list for 2.2?
I addition to what Rob already mentioned, there needs to be
11 matches
Mail list logo