Re: [WORKAROUND SUCCESS] Re: et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-24 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: they come with the release distro: Fine, so just remove them, let them be regenerated, and move on with life. huh? Huh what, you said you did just this. and shared with you the results of making 'it' work on OSX 10.4.1. i've been trying to be

Re: [WORKAROUND SUCCESS] Re: et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-24 Thread OpenMacNews
That was a summary not how it came across. fair nuf. The ultimate fix upstream is for these files to not be included dealer's choice, of course but I can't go back in time to fix 2.2.12. really wasn't asking/expecting you to ... thx for your help! cheers, richard --- Cyrus Home Page:

et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-23 Thread OpenMacNews
derrick, fwiw, i'm seeing et_list-related errors as well, but on OSX 10.4.1 `initialize_imap_error_table_r': /usr/local/warez/cyrus-imapd-2.2.10/imap/imap_err.c:68: undefined reference to `initialize_error_table_r' libimap.a(imap_err.o)(.text+0x14):/usr/local/warez/cyrus-imapd-2.2.10/imap/i

Re: et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-23 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: -L/usr/local/DarkMatter/berkeley-db/lib -ldb-4.3 -lssl -lcrypto /usr/lib/libcom_err.a powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.0: /usr/lib/libcom_err.a: No such file or directory I assume they provide /usr/lib/libcom_err.dylib. Edit the makefile to refer

Re: et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-23 Thread OpenMacNews
hi derrick, thx for the reply =) On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: -L/usr/local/berkeley-db/lib -ldb-4.3 -lssl -lcrypto /usr/lib/libcom_err.a powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.0: /usr/lib/libcom_err.a: No such file or directory I assume they provide /usr/lib/libcom_err.dylib.

Re: et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-23 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: % make depend % make all fails @: ... sievec.c gcc -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -L/usr/local/berkeley-db/lib -bind_at_load -ldl -L/usr/local/berkeley-db/lib -ldb -F/Library/Frameworks -framework SASL2 -o sievec sievec.o libsieve.a

Re: et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-23 Thread OpenMacNews
hi again, Well, so, if you manually use compile_et from /usr/bin to compile the et file, does it emit a __et_list reference? sorry, confused. the et_file ... -- which file in the imapd distro? Otherwise, you have some other compile_et being used. Get rid of it. There can be only one ...

Re: et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-23 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: hi again, Well, so, if you manually use compile_et from /usr/bin to compile the et file, does it emit a __et_list reference? sorry, confused. the et_file ... -- which file in the imapd distro? Not the et_file; The et file. There are several.

Re: et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-23 Thread OpenMacNews
hi again, Well, so, if you manually use compile_et from /usr/bin to compile the et file, does it emit a __et_list reference? Not the et_file; The et file. There are several. Ultimately you want them all, but for test purposes one will do imap/imap_err.et imap/nntp_err.et

Re: et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-23 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: % which compile_et /usr/bin/compile_et % compile_et imap/imap_err.et Error Table imap has base -1904809472 Well, it writes out imap_err.h, imap_err.c, and the latter would have the reference. % ls -al

Re: et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-23 Thread OpenMacNews
hi derrick, a bit more info/data ... well it sure seems that com_err/et_list originate from / revolve around Kerberos. so, I decided to try take Apple's Kerberos implementation out of the picture, and build my own. a build of MIT's krb5-1.4.1

Re: et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-23 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: hi derrick, a bit more info/data ... well it sure seems that com_err/et_list originate from / revolve around Kerberos. Kerberos uses them, and they are from MIT, but there are non-Kerberos things which do. Apple provides it with/due to Kerberos.

Re: [WORKAROUND SUCCESS] Re: et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-23 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: they come with the release distro: Fine, so just remove them, let them be regenerated, and move on with life. The problem is that *our* compile_et doesn't match *your* libcom_err, in fact. So this step: manually recompile the .et files: %

Re: [WORKAROUND SUCCESS] Re: et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-23 Thread OpenMacNews
they come with the release distro: Fine, so just remove them, let them be regenerated, and move on with life. huh? you asked, i answered ... and shared with you the results of making 'it' work on OSX 10.4.1. i've been trying to be helpful ... why the sudden attitude change? richard ---

[WORKAROUND SUCCESS] Re: et_list com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

2005-05-23 Thread OpenMacNews
hi derrick, well it sure seems that com_err/et_list originate from / revolve around Kerberos. Kerberos uses them, and they are from MIT, but there are non-Kerberos things which do. Apple provides it with/due to Kerberos. clear. 1st, after a fresh DL, we still have the 'suspect': % grep