Re: patch to force cyrus to reload its configuration in a more rigorous way

2008-09-18 Thread Wesley Craig
On 06 Apr 2008, at 11:28, Alain Spineux wrote: > I opened a new bug on bugzilla. > > https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=2987 I think you mean: https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=3053 I've reviewed the patch. Please address my comments to get it committed. Th

Re: patch to force cyrus to reload its configuration in a more rigorous way

2008-04-06 Thread Alain Spineux
I opened a new bug on bugzilla. https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=2987 Alain On 4/2/08, Alain Spineux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Before this patch, cyrus was already able to detect a configuration >

Re: patch to force cyrus to reload its configuration in a more rigorous way

2008-04-02 Thread Alain Spineux
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Before this patch, cyrus was already able to detect a configuration > > file change, > > but only at the end of a connection. And any process waiting for a > > new connection was ignoring the change during the next conn

Re: patch to force cyrus to reload its configuration in a more rigorous way

2008-04-02 Thread Simon Matter
> Before this patch, cyrus was already able to detect a configuration > file change, > but only at the end of a connection. And any process waiting for a > new connection was ignoring the change during the next connection, > until they have finished. > In other word, after a configuration change, a

patch to force cyrus to reload its configuration in a more rigorous way

2008-04-01 Thread Alain Spineux
Before this patch, cyrus was already able to detect a configuration file change, but only at the end of a connection. And any process waiting for a new connection was ignoring the change during the next connection, until they have finished. In other word, after a configuration change, any waiting p