Fixed in CVS.
Thanks,
Ken
John Holman wrote:
>
> Just to say that this is also a problem for us. Our email addresses are
> case insensitive, and I can be mailed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or any other combination. Users complain about having
> to put their mail address into th
Hello,
i remember using the standard vacation and also procmail for these
purposes. I guess that the main reason, why lmtpd needs information about
the recipient, is to avoid that vacation messages are sent to mailing
lists. And then it seems very unlikely to me, that a users mail address
differs
At 19:30 14/01/02, Gary Mills wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:35:49PM +, John Holman wrote:
> >
> > In fact, even when the local part of addresses is case sensitive, I think
> > it would be better to do a case insensitive match for purposes of deciding
> > eligibility for a vacation message
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:35:49PM +, John Holman wrote:
>
> In fact, even when the local part of addresses is case sensitive, I think
> it would be better to do a case insensitive match for purposes of deciding
> eligibility for a vacation message. After all, if the message is delivered
>
Just to say that this is also a problem for us. Our email addresses are
case insensitive, and I can be mailed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or any other combination. Users complain about having
to put their mail address into the vacation facility at all - and are not
at all happy a
Hello,
i am still fighting with vacation. As far as i understand the source
code, and what i read in the archives, the envelope address and the
strings in the :addresses field are compared to To, Cc and Bcc fields.
If they match, a vacation message may be sent.
My sendmail configuration, which is
