On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 12:29:41PM -0500, Paul M Fleming wrote:
Rounding error would present a problem for us and our users. My 2 cents
.. quotas 4GB are fairly rare. I know with a large student user base
with 50-75Mb quotas rounding to the nearest K wouldn't be desirable.
Okay, color me
Joe Rhett wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 12:29:41PM -0500, Paul M Fleming wrote:
Rounding error would present a problem for us and our users. My 2 cents
.. quotas 4GB are fairly rare. I know with a large student user base
with 50-75Mb quotas rounding to the nearest K wouldn't be desirable.
Or do you really need to give some users 5,121,133 byte quotas? Do you
really manage your quotas down to less than 1 kilobyte, when you are giving
the users 50 megabyte boundaries on the low side?
Or am I missing your point entirely?
The problem is if you keep only the count of kBytes in
Quoting Joe Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I doubt (I may be wrong) that the idea was to round everything -- just the
actual quota. So calculate each message normally and then round the total
to k to compare against the quota.
Since the error of margin could be 1/2 k, with 1 million users you
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Paul M Fleming wrote:
Rounding error would present a problem for us and our users. My 2 cents
.. quotas 4GB are fairly rare. I know with a large student user base
with 50-75Mb quotas rounding to the nearest K wouldn't be desirable. I
can't imagine doing a search on a
Hi,
Perhaps quota calculations could be changed to use 64 bit integers?
The current algorithm should continue to work.
It would be nice if the max useful quota were to be documented. Max
quota = 4,194,303 QU for a 32 bit implementation or 18,014,398,509,481,983 QU
for 64 bits. Attempts to set a
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Mark Keasling wrote:
Perhaps quota calculations could be changed to use 64 bit integers?
The current algorithm should continue to work.
Right. Thats the fix (or some other integer size 32 bits).
-Rob
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
: quota warning problem - Is it a bug of cyrus imap?
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, [gb2312] Daniel Qian | ǮʡÄÏ wrote:
I have installed cyrus imap 2.13 recently and it works very well ecept
when the mailbox data reaches big volume. On a 10G quota for a mailbox
the server starts warning the outlook user
Simon Brady wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, [gb2312] Daniel Qian :
I have installed cyrus imap 2.13 recently and it works very well ecept
when the mailbox data reaches big volume. On a 10G quota for a mailbox
the server starts warning the outlook user and closes the connection
when the used space
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Simon Brady wrote:
I haven't looked at the code, but this sounds like what you'd see if quota
math was being done in 32 bits: 10G mod 4G = 2G, and 90% of 2G is 18% of
the original 10G figure.
Yup, cyrus doesn't support quotas larger than 32bits at the current time.
This
I have installed cyrus imap 2.13 recently and it works very well ecept
when the mailbox data reaches big volume. On a 10G quota for a mailbox
the server starts warning the outlook user and closes the connection
when the used space is just al little over 15% of the quota. But for
small quota the
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, [gb2312] Daniel Qian | ǮʡÄÏ wrote:
I have installed cyrus imap 2.13 recently and it works very well ecept
when the mailbox data reaches big volume. On a 10G quota for a mailbox
the server starts warning the outlook user and closes the connection
when the used space is
12 matches
Mail list logo
