Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-11 Thread Michael D. Sofka
Bron Gondwana wrote: On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 08:23:15AM -0400, Michael D. Sofka wrote: Great. One final question on this topic. I currently have a warm-backup server (2.2.12) that I rsync to each night. As mailboxes are moved to the new 2.3.16 server the rsynced index files would be the

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-09 Thread Wesley Craig
On 09 Oct 2010, at 00:04, Michael D. Sofka wrote: Is the old format updated on xfer? It is updated on xfer -- when the mtimes of the message files are set to the INTERNALDATE. :wes Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info:

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-09 Thread Michael D. Sofka
Great. One final question on this topic. I currently have a warm-backup server (2.2.12) that I rsync to each night. As mailboxes are moved to the new 2.3.16 server the rsynced index files would be the wrong version. I can either rsync just the mail messages to the warm backup, and then

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-09 Thread Patrick Goetz
On 10/9/2010 7:23 AM, Michael D. Sofka wrote: I can either rsync just the mail messages to the warm backup, and then reconstruct the index files. Or, I can take a slight detour, and upgrade the warm backup server to 2.3.16. This is something I've been wondering, too. The problem with not

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-09 Thread Simon Matter
On 10/9/2010 7:23 AM, Michael D. Sofka wrote: I can either rsync just the mail messages to the warm backup, and then reconstruct the index files. Or, I can take a slight detour, and upgrade the warm backup server to 2.3.16. This is something I've been wondering, too. The problem with not

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-09 Thread Michael D. Sofka
Imapsync with the proxy user is a third option during migration. I tested imapsync previously and it worked. But rsync was much faster. As to index consistency, I run the backups from an lvm snapshot. Mike Simon Matter simon.mat...@invoca.ch wrote: On 10/9/2010 7:23 AM, Michael D. Sofka

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-09 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 09:59:44AM -0500, Patrick Goetz wrote: On 10/9/2010 7:23 AM, Michael D. Sofka wrote: I can either rsync just the mail messages to the warm backup, and then reconstruct the index files. Or, I can take a slight detour, and upgrade the warm backup server to 2.3.16.

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-09 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 08:23:15AM -0400, Michael D. Sofka wrote: Great. One final question on this topic. I currently have a warm-backup server (2.2.12) that I rsync to each night. As mailboxes are moved to the new 2.3.16 server the rsynced index files would be the wrong version. I

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-09 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 07:30:36AM -0400, Wesley Craig wrote: On 09 Oct 2010, at 00:04, Michael D. Sofka wrote: Is the old format updated on xfer? It is updated on xfer -- when the mtimes of the message files are set to the INTERNALDATE. Yes, file mtimes get set to INTERNALDATE as much as

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-09 Thread Wesley Craig
On 09 Oct 2010, at 20:31, Bron Gondwana wrote: Yes, file mtimes get set to INTERNALDATE as much as possible (and vice versa when reconstructing with a missing index - hence the reason for doing it) Perhaps you're misunderstanding me... In 2.3.recent, the second to last step of undump (xfer)

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-09 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 10:24:41PM -0400, Wesley Craig wrote: On 09 Oct 2010, at 20:31, Bron Gondwana wrote: Yes, file mtimes get set to INTERNALDATE as much as possible (and vice versa when reconstructing with a missing index - hence the reason for doing it) Perhaps you're

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-09 Thread Wesley Craig
On 09 Oct 2010, at 23:12, Bron Gondwana wrote: Oh yeah - you're right. That's missing in 2.4 and I think it's because I planned to replace it with replication stuff which uses the append logic which does that on the fly. But I haven't done it yet. Would make sense to add that back, at least

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-08 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 02:40:01PM -0400, Michael D. Sofka wrote: But, when I try to move it back to the 2.2.12 back-end the same error message. Is this a cyrus version incompatibility? That is, are the moves one-way, at least when using xfer? Gosh yes. The mailbox internal format has

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-08 Thread Michael D. Sofka
Bron, Thanks for the answer. A one way xfer in fine. I'm just testing the new server, and the migration process. Is the old format updated on xfer? The account I moved is working fine. Mike Bron Gondwana br...@fastmail.fm wrote: On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 02:40:01PM -0400, Michael D. Sofka

Re: service imap pid nnn in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2010-10-08 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 12:04:23AM -0400, Michael D. Sofka wrote: Bron, Thanks for the answer. A one way xfer in fine. I'm just testing the new server, and the migration process. Is the old format updated on xfer? The account I moved is working fine. Cyrus will automatically update the