On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Wesley Craig wrote:
My solution (such as it is) was to reduce the wasteful amount of space
sync_server was allocating per message:
[...]
The times-5 is completely gratuitous. In fact the pre-allocation of any
memory for paths is wasteful, but I was not up for
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:21:01 +0100 (BST), David Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Wesley Craig wrote:
My solution (such as it is) was to reduce the wasteful amount of space
sync_server was allocating per message:
[...]
The times-5 is completely gratuitous. In fact
Ok, so this isn't a memory leak as such, but...
When sync_client has a large folder to send (for
the sake of far too many hours of me trying to
make this work let's just say it's 180,000
messages), then it just sends a single
UPLOAD [lastuid] [lastappenddate] followed by
every single message on
I saw this problem the first time I enabled replication on a machine
hosting all the IT support staff the University of Michigan. Plenty
of large mailboxes there!
My solution (such as it is) was to reduce the wasteful amount of
space sync_server was allocating per message:
---
