Rob Siemborski wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
Is there any reason not to use:
hashimapspool: true
Are there guidelines on when it is an advantage or a disadvantage to
use
it?
I can't think of a time when you *shouldn't* use it, really. It may not
offer much of a benefit on
Rob Siemborski wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Andrew J Caird wrote:
Is there any reason not to use:
hashimapspool: true
Are there guidelines on when it is an advantage or a disadvantage to use
it?
I can't think of a time when you *shouldn't* use it, really. It may not
offer much of a benefi
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
Is there any reason not to use:
hashimapspool: true
Are there guidelines on when it is an advantage or a disadvantage to use
it?
I can't think of a time when you *shouldn't* use it, really. It may not
offer much of a benefit on some filesystems, b
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Andrew J Caird wrote:
> Is there any reason not to use:
> hashimapspool: true
> Are there guidelines on when it is an advantage or a disadvantage to use
> it?
I can't think of a time when you *shouldn't* use it, really. It may not
offer much of a benefit on some filesy
## Andrew J Caird ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Is there any reason not to use:
> hashimapspool: true
> Are there guidelines on when it is an advantage or a disadvantage to use
> it?
"Recommended for large (no of mailboxes) spools". "Large" depends on
your filesystem. Linux/ext3 takes some 15 thou
Is there any reason not to use:
hashimapspool: true
Are there guidelines on when it is an advantage or a disadvantage to use
it?
I've looked through the docs and the list archives and haven't seen
anything either way.
Thanks.
--
Andrew Caird
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyru
