Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Scott Russell wrote: Won't this affect sieve scripts too? I thought it would require INBOX.folder to be written as INBOX/folder. Well, I ended up changing some stuff from INBOX.folder to INBOX/folder indeed. Anyway, the transition was smooth :) Thank you guys. Antoine Cyrus Home Page:

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread Charles Marcus
Stupid question really, but... ... Some time ago, I built a cyrus-imapd server with some defaults options. Everything works really fine. Today, I'm going to need to add some new users with a dot in their name, like joe.1 and joe.2. I _know_ this is possible using the unixhierarchy option in

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread Ken Murchison
Charles Marcus wrote: Stupid question really, but... ... Some time ago, I built a cyrus-imapd server with some defaults options. Everything works really fine. Today, I'm going to need to add some new users with a dot in their name, like joe.1 and joe.2. I _know_ this is possible using the

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread Scott Russell
Charles Marcus wrote: What is the advantage/disadvantage? Is the only difference the ability to use the dot in foldernames? In other words, if you set this to true, do you *lose* anything? You loose the ability to have a / in mailbox names and gain the ability to have a . in mailbox names :)

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread Claudio Saavedra
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 15:37 +, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: Hello :) Stupid question really, but... ... Some time ago, I built a cyrus-imapd server with some defaults options. Everything works really fine. Today, I'm going to need to add some new users with a dot in their name, like joe.1

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread NM Public
On 30 Aug 2005, Scott Russell wrote: Charles Marcus wrote: What is the advantage/disadvantage? Is the only difference the ability to use the dot in foldernames? In other words, if you set this to true, do you *lose* anything? You loose the ability to have a / in mailbox names and gain the

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread Cristian Mitrana
* NM Public [EMAIL PROTECTED] [30-08-05 18:34]: [...] Another issue is that if unixhierarchy is true, plus addresses will look like this: username+directory/[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does anyone know if any mail servers have a problem with a '/' in the

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Claudio Saavedra wrote: No. You only need to consider that if you need to go back to the default configuration, every dot in a mailbox name will be converted to a ^. So the mailbox antoine.jacoutot will become antoine^jacoutot, and antoine.jacoutot/my-old-emails will become

unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-29 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Hello :) Stupid question really, but... ... Some time ago, I built a cyrus-imapd server with some defaults options. Everything works really fine. Today, I'm going to need to add some new users with a dot in their name, like joe.1 and joe.2. I _know_ this is possible using the unixhierarchy option

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-29 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 15:37 +, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: Hello :) Stupid question really, but... ... Some time ago, I built a cyrus-imapd server with some defaults options. Everything works really fine. Today, I'm going to need to add some new users with a dot in their name, like joe.1

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-29 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Craig White wrote: shouldn't matter - it's really an interface issue. Allright then... thanks. I will run a reconstruct too, as you suggested. Regards, Antoine Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info:

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-29 Thread Ken Murchison
Antoine Jacoutot wrote: Craig White wrote: shouldn't matter - it's really an interface issue. Allright then... thanks. I will run a reconstruct too, as you suggested. You don't need to do a reconstruct. You will probably have to have your users restart their clients. -- Kenneth

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-29 Thread Scott Russell
Ken Murchison wrote: Antoine Jacoutot wrote: Craig White wrote: shouldn't matter - it's really an interface issue. Allright then... thanks. I will run a reconstruct too, as you suggested. You don't need to do a reconstruct. You will probably have to have your users restart their

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Em Seg 29 Ago 2005 17:37, Scott Russell escreveu: You don't need to do a reconstruct. You will probably have to have your users restart their clients. Won't this affect sieve scripts too? I thought it would require INBOX.folder to be written as INBOX/folder. Yes, it will affect sieve

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-29 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
Antoine Jacoutot wrote: Hello :) Stupid question really, but... ... Some time ago, I built a cyrus-imapd server with some defaults options. Everything works really fine. Today, I'm going to need to add some new users with a dot in their name, like joe.1 and joe.2. I _know_ this is possible