Re: authorization with ptloader and authentication by sasl

2005-06-09 Thread Thomas Vogt
Hi again, Perhaps I've to give more information inkl. debug output I'm running cyrus imapd 2.2.12 imap.conf: configdirectory: /m/imap partition-default: /m/spool/imap logtimestamps: yes sieveusehomedir: false sievedir: /m/imap/sieve hashimapspool: true sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd

Re: rfc 3685 (Spamtest and VirusTest Extensions)

2005-06-09 Thread Andrew B. Panphiloff
I see some unwanted behavior during using spamtest extension. For example using simple rules from this page: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3685.txt?number=3685 require [spamtest, fileinto, relational, comparator-i;ascii-numeric]; if spamtest :value eq :comparator i;ascii-numeric 0

IMSP server - development

2005-06-09 Thread Ondrej Sury
Hi there, I just wanted to ask if there is active (or at least semi-active) development on IMSP server? I found version 1.8 which fixes some compile error from 1.7b. I would like to add support for virtual domains, dots in usernames, dirhash and fulldirhash. Running under cyrus master daemon

Re: rfc 3685 (Spamtest and VirusTest Extensions)

2005-06-09 Thread Igor Brezac
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Andrew B. Panphiloff wrote: I see some unwanted behavior during using spamtest extension. For example using simple rules from this page: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3685.txt?number=3685 require [spamtest, fileinto, relational, comparator-i;ascii-numeric]; if

Re: authorization with ptloader and authentication by sasl

2005-06-09 Thread Igor Brezac
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Thomas Vogt wrote: Hi again, Perhaps I've to give more information inkl. debug output I'm running cyrus imapd 2.2.12 imap.conf: configdirectory: /m/imap partition-default: /m/spool/imap logtimestamps: yes sieveusehomedir: false sievedir: /m/imap/sieve hashimapspool: true

Notice: **Last Warning**

2005-06-09 Thread websrvr
What's wrong with this picture???This is the link that is contained within and it seems suspicious.http://62.193.220.183/[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Jun 09, 2005, at 04:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Valued Member, According to our site policy you will have to confirm your account by the following

Message contains invalid header

2005-06-09 Thread User Siggi
I'm having the following problem. If someone could tell me why this error occurs I would be most thankful. Platform is Mac OSX Server 10.4.1. relay=cyrus, delay=1, status=bounced (data format error. Command output: john: Message contains invalid header ) This being the message's header. I

Re: Notice: **Last Warning**

2005-06-09 Thread Anders Norrbring
On 2005-06-09 17:36 websrvr wrote: What's wrong with this picture??? This is the link that is contained within and it seems suspicious. http://62.193.220.183/[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Jun 09, 2005, at 04:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *Dear Valued Member, *

Multiple server R/W access to mailboxes

2005-06-09 Thread David Manchado
Hello, I have a 'pseudo' High Availability SMTP system consisting in two servers running cyrus 2.2.5. The main problem I have is that only one of the two nodes can access to the mailboxes in order to keep the integrity of the cyrus databases despite the filesystem (GFS) has support to allow

Re: Notice: **Last Warning**

2005-06-09 Thread Luc Brouard
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 06:05:10PM +0200, Anders Norrbring wrote: On 2005-06-09 17:36 websrvr wrote: What's wrong with this picture??? This is the link that is contained within and it seems suspicious. http://62.193.220.183/[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Jun 09, 2005, at 04:56 AM, [EMAIL

Re: Message contains invalid header

2005-06-09 Thread Peter A. Friend
On Jun 9, 2005, at 8:56 AM, User Siggi wrote: My response inline... I'm having the following problem. If someone could tell me why this error occurs I would be most thankful. Platform is Mac OSX Server 10.4.1. relay=cyrus, delay=1, status=bounced (data format error. Command output:

Re: rfc 3685 (Spamtest and VirusTest Extensions)

2005-06-09 Thread Michael Loftis
--On June 9, 2005 10:50:24 AM -0400 Igor Brezac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is nothing wrong with this, perhaps the performance is not as good. I'd welcome some kind of return value caching code. Cyrus sieve engine itself does not cache return values from various tests. I suppose

Using IMAPd to send emails?

2005-06-09 Thread Gregg Berkholtz
This topic doesn't seem to be covered in the docs, FAQ, Wiki, mailing list searches, or Google - so please forgive me if it's a FAQ... Many environments are seeing a steady increase in attachment sizes, and hence are encountering growing issues associated with uploading multi-megabyte emails

backup without stopping the imap server?

2005-06-09 Thread Markus Heller
Dear list, I would like to ask once again as I have not received a positive answer yet. Does the cyrus imap server meanwhile offer the feature of a seemless / checkpointed backup that does not require to stop the service? Thanks in advance, Markus --- Cyrus Home Page:

Re: Using IMAPd to send emails?

2005-06-09 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Gregg Berkholtz wrote: This topic doesn't seem to be covered in the docs, FAQ, Wiki, mailing list searches, or Google - so please forgive me if it's a FAQ... Many environments are seeing a steady increase in attachment sizes, and hence are encountering growing issues associated with uploading

Re: backup without stopping the imap server?

2005-06-09 Thread Robin Rainton
Hi, From what I recall (which might be fuzzy - someone please correct me if any of this is wrong!) there is no way to do this properly. There's some stuff about it on the wiki isn't there? Think I remember seeing something about using LVM mirrors to do it best. Basically, you have to stop the

Re: Using IMAPd to send emails?

2005-06-09 Thread Gregg Berkholtz
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:04:45AM +0200, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: Gregg Berkholtz wrote: This topic doesn't seem to be covered in the docs, FAQ, Wiki, mailing list searches, or Google - so please forgive me if it's a FAQ... Many environments are seeing a steady increase in attachment

Re: backup without stopping the imap server?

2005-06-09 Thread James Treleaven
The best idea I have seen is two rsync's: the first while the server is running and the second (much faster one) with it momentarily stopped. James Robin Rainton wrote: Hi, From what I recall (which might be fuzzy - someone please correct me if any of this is wrong!) there is no way to do