Re: Slow lmtpd

2007-03-05 Thread Rob Mueller
I had to reduce the default value of "lmtp_destination_concurrency_limit" in postfix to 10 (the default is 20), and change the value of "queue_run_delay" on some servers to avoid having them all run their queues at the same time, because that ends up causing the lmtpd process limit to be reached.

Re: Slow lmtpd

2007-03-05 Thread Andre Nathan
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 09:13 +1100, Rob Mueller wrote: > I've never seen over 100%, and it doesn't seem to make sense, so I'm > guessing it's a bogus value. Yeah, I talked to the Coraid guys and they told me iostat reports incorrect values for AoE. > > avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %i

Re: Slow lmtpd

2007-03-05 Thread Rob Mueller
Can values way above 100% be trusted? If so, it's pretty bad (this is from a situation where there are 200 lmtp processes, which is the current limit I set): I've never seen over 100%, and it doesn't seem to make sense, so I'm guessing it's a bogus value. avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %i

cyrus cuts away the realm on the admin user

2007-03-05 Thread Marten Lehmann
Hello, I want to authenticate the admin user against ldap as all other users in our setup. Our admin user is something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] whereby "server" is set as defaultdomain in imapd.conf. When I login with a usual account it looks like this: Mar 5 22:09:58 vmx saslauthd[27772]: do

Re: DBERROR: skiplist recovery mailboxes.db 0090 - suddenly all is failing!

2007-03-05 Thread Gregor Wenkelewsky
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:26:10 +0100, Andrew Morgan wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Gregor Wenkelewsky wrote: > >> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:15:53 +0100, Andrew Morgan wrote: >> Cyrus has been installed here just a few weeks ago, and after some hard days it was working smoothly and very well. U

Re: Slow lmtpd

2007-03-05 Thread John Madden
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 12:19 -0300, Andre Nathan wrote: > On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 14:23 +1100, Rob Mueller wrote: > > %util - Percentage of CPU time during which I/O requests were issued to the > > device (bandwidth utilization for the device). Device saturation occurs > > when > > this value is cl

reconstruct deletes messages

2007-03-05 Thread Joseph Brennan
We're running into cases where running reconstruct removes message files, sometimes all of the messages in a folder, leaving only the directory and the cyrus.cache, cyrus.header, cyrus.index files. This makes no sense to me at all. I thought the only purpose of reconstruct is to rebuild the ind

Re: Slow lmtpd

2007-03-05 Thread Andre Nathan
On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 14:23 +1100, Rob Mueller wrote: > %util - Percentage of CPU time during which I/O requests were issued to the > device (bandwidth utilization for the device). Device saturation occurs when > this value is close to 100%. Can values way above 100% be trusted? If so, it's pret

Re: Shared Seen Flag in Shared Folders

2007-03-05 Thread Tim Bannister
Back in 2005, Senandung Mendonan wrote: > I'm looking for a way to get shared \Seen flag feature in shared > folders, instead of the default per-user. One past discussion thread > ended with this:- > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=info-cyrus&m=103784712122098&w=2 … > Anyone got this feature hac

Re: Slow lmtpd

2007-03-05 Thread Andre Nathan
On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 13:14 +0100, Simon Matter wrote: > 1) Try to put different kind of data (spool, meta databases) on > independant storage (which means independant paths, disks, SAN > controllers). For the small things like cyrus databases, putting them on > separate local attached SCSI/SATA di

BerkeleyDB problems, converting away

2007-03-05 Thread Tuomas Toropainen
Hello I had a dream, that berkeleydb problems would had been solved a long time ago in a way or another. It seems that this was only a dream... I am seeing lots of following log errors and I dont like them. The question is: how can I find out what database formats is cyrus server using and w

Re: Postfix and catch all

2007-03-05 Thread Martin Kraus
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:13:36AM +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Hello, > > When I want to use catch-all with Postfix without virtual hosts, there > is an option luser_relay, but luser_relay works only for the default > Postfix local delivery agent. > > Is there another way to make a catch-al

Re: Postfix and catch all

2007-03-05 Thread Paul van der Vlis
lartc schreef: > hi paul, > > using ldap in postfix, i setup a mail alias: > > @domain.com > > all mail is going to the user ... I use normal unix passwords, and I don't use authentication in Postfix. Postfix simply knows which users do excist With regards, Paul van der Vlis. -- http://w

subscribe

2007-03-05 Thread René Kockisch
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

Re: Postfix and catch all

2007-03-05 Thread lartc
hi paul, using ldap in postfix, i setup a mail alias: @domain.com all mail is going to the user ... cheers charles On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 10:13 +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Hello, > > When I want to use catch-all with Postfix without virtual hosts, there > is an option luser_relay, but l

Postfix and catch all

2007-03-05 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Hello, When I want to use catch-all with Postfix without virtual hosts, there is an option luser_relay, but luser_relay works only for the default Postfix local delivery agent. Is there another way to make a catch-all-mailbox without using virtual hosts? With regards, Paul van der Vlis. -- ht