On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Gary Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once again, we had somebody use the sieve facility to redirect e-mail
back to the same mailbox and then go on vacation. This sets up a
forwarding loop which cyrus breaks by discarding the e-mail. During
this vacation,
David Newman wrote:
Greetings. I'm building a 2.3.11 server from ports on FreeBSD 7.0/i386.
I'm also using these two University of Athens patches:
http://email.uoa.gr/download/cyrus/cyrus-imapd-2.3.11/cyrus-imapd-2.3.11-autocreate-0.10-0.diff
--On Sunday, March 30, 2008 2:27 PM +0100 Alain Spineux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't we have a better solution to this problem? Some people
expect that forwarding e-mail to yourself should work; nobody expects
the messages to vanish without a trace.
You must enforce this at
Joseph Brennan wrote:
No, it is just totally wrong that an action other than 'discard' will
result in mail silently vanishing. Maybe this is what does happen, but
it is not what _should_ happen as was asked. It _should_ either go to
inbox (grounds: ignore a bad rule)
You are assuming that a
Hi all
I have created my TLS cert according to these instructions:
openssl req -new -nodes -out req.pem -keyout key.pem
openssl rsa -in key.pem -out new.key.pem
openssl x509 -in req.pem -out ca-cert -req \
-signkey new.key.pem -days 999
mkdir /var/imap
cp new.key.pem /var/imap/server.pem
rm
Bernhard D Rohrer wrote:
Hi all
I have created my TLS cert according to these instructions:
openssl req -new -nodes -out req.pem -keyout key.pem
openssl rsa -in key.pem -out new.key.pem
openssl x509 -in req.pem -out ca-cert -req \
-signkey new.key.pem -days 999
mkdir /var/imap
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Bernhard D Rohrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I have created my TLS cert according to these instructions:
openssl req -new -nodes -out req.pem -keyout key.pem
openssl rsa -in key.pem -out new.key.pem
openssl x509 -in req.pem -out ca-cert -req \
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 02:27:29PM +0100, Alain Spineux wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Gary Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once again, we had somebody use the sieve facility to redirect e-mail
back to the same mailbox and then go on vacation. This sets up a
forwarding loop which
