Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.16 Released

2010-01-12 Thread Simon Matter
> Bron Gondwana wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 09:11:10AM +0100, Simon Matter wrote: Or you can use a dummy backend. It's a backend which always says « OK » when you try to write in it, and always says « not in db » when you read in it. This backend was never committed into cyrus-

Re: Question about reconstruct

2010-01-12 Thread Brian Awood
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 18:15:29 Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:57:28AM -0800, wcoo...@nakedape.cc wrote: > > > > Perhaps it would be a good idea, then, to make the '-k' behavior the > > default and use another option to invert the logic? > > Absolutely... it will probably ha

Re: Question about reconstruct

2010-01-12 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:57:28AM -0800, wcoo...@nakedape.cc wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 16:24 -0200, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > >>From the Cyrus chapter of WMOGAG: > > > > The most important options for reconstruct are -r and -k. The > > -r > > option causes reconstruct to reindex the specif

sync_client segmentation fault when using TLS

2010-01-12 Thread Dietmar Rieder
Hi, we just updated our master + replication servers from 2.3.13 to 2.3.16 and discovered, that the sync_client is dying with a segfault when it connects to the replication server which has set "allowplaintext: no". We managed to trace down the problem and came up with the following patch ag

Re: Question about reconstruct

2010-01-12 Thread wcooley
> On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 16:24 -0200, Sergio Belkin wrote: >>From the Cyrus chapter of WMOGAG: > > The most important options for reconstruct are -r and -k. The > -r > option causes reconstruct to reindex the specified mailbox and all > subordinate mailboxes, otherwise child mailboxes are not rein