On 05/28/2010 09:37 PM, Wesley Craig wrote:
On 28 May 2010, at 09:09, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=3174
Thanks, for replying. But I'm not sure what you are saying with the
above patches.
If you apply the above fix and set allowplaintext to no then
On 05/31/2010 03:31 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:58:57PM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Renaming forth and back is a way, but not a really good solution to this
problem.
Hi Mark,
Have you been able to fix this? It seems a bug to me.
Sorry, yes - it's a bug. It will be
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:14:02AM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
On 05/31/2010 03:31 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:58:57PM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Renaming forth and back is a way, but not a really good solution to this
problem.
Hi Mark,
Have you been able to
On 06/01/2010 11:31 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
How are other people doing this who are using partitions and replication?
(we don't use partitions)
We are now in a point where we could use partitions.
Is it common to rename mailboxes across partitions once they're created?
Well we would use
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:14:02AM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
On 05/31/2010 03:31 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:58:57PM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Renaming forth and back is a way, but not a really good solution to this
--On 1. Juni 2010 19:31:54 +1000 Bron Gondwana br...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Is it common to rename mailboxes across partitions once they're created?
Speaking for myself: very much so! It's how we balance disk space over our
(currently) four partitions. Whenever we run out of disk space we add a
On 06/01/2010 11:46 AM, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
--On 1. Juni 2010 19:31:54 +1000 Bron Gondwana br...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Is it common to rename mailboxes across partitions once they're created?
Speaking for myself: very much so! It's how we balance disk space over
our (currently) four
--On 1. Juni 2010 11:51:16 +0200 Rudy Gevaert rudy.geva...@ugent.be wrote:
That's why I've
writen a script that moves mailboxes from the fullest partition to the
one with the most free space. Works really well.
Taking a side step, if I'm permitted. How do you handle the move
(regarding mail
On 06/01/2010 12:01 PM, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
--On 1. Juni 2010 11:51:16 +0200 Rudy Gevaert rudy.geva...@ugent.be
wrote:
That's why I've
writen a script that moves mailboxes from the fullest partition to the
one with the most free space. Works really well.
Taking a side step, if I'm
On 01 Jun 2010, at 05:09, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Can you tell me how to further troubleshoot, please?
sync_client ought to syslog any error that backend_connect() gets.
:wes
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 03:49:41PM -0400, Wesley Craig wrote:
On 28 May 2010, at 12:42, Gary Mills wrote:
0805e4ee proxy_check_input (815d168, 81a7228, 819e520, 81a3d60,
81a7700, 0) + 5e
That last argument to proxy_check_input()? It's the timeout.
Setting it to 0 means don't time
On 01 Jun 2010, at 14:05, Gary Mills wrote:
Yes, the timeout is set to zero in the pop3d.c file. However, the
idle timeout actually works when I test it. In one window, I do this:
$ telnet setup01 pop3
Trying 130.179.16.64...
Connected to setup01.cc.umanitoba.ca.
Escape
On 01 Jun 2010, at 14:05, Gary Mills wrote:
# pstack 12708
12708: pop3d -s
feb1a5c5 read (0, 817faf0, b)
fec2dfaf sock_read () + 3f
I don't know why the stack trace is so short with these.
Thinking about this a little more...
sock_read() is probably from openssl's
13 matches
Mail list logo
