Re: Cyrus IMAP running in linux: recommended file system

2010-12-16 Thread David Lang
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:09:58PM -0800, David Lang wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote: >> >>> I know that this question is controversy and there is no exact answer. >>> >>> But currently what is the best file system in Linux to

Re: Cyrus IMAP running in linux: recommended file system

2010-12-16 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:09:58PM -0800, David Lang wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote: > > > I know that this question is controversy and there is no exact answer. > > > > But currently what is the best file system in Linux to handle > > thousands of small files? > > I ha

Re: Cyrus IMAP running in linux: recommended file system

2010-12-16 Thread David Lang
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote: > I know that this question is controversy and there is no exact answer. > > But currently what is the best file system in Linux to handle > thousands of small files? > I have mailboxes with 4Gb. And messages with ~4Kb. > Ext4 ? depending on who

Re: Cyrus IMAP running in linux: recommended file system

2010-12-16 Thread Patrick Boutilier
On 12/16/2010 09:37 PM, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote: > I know that this question is controversy and there is no exact answer. > > But currently what is the best file system in Linux to handle > thousands of small files? > I have mailboxes with 4Gb. And messages with ~4Kb. > Ext4 ? We are using ex

Cyrus IMAP running in linux: recommended file system

2010-12-16 Thread Lucas Zinato Carraro
I know that this question is controversy and there is no exact answer. But currently what is the best file system in Linux to handle thousands of small files? I have mailboxes with 4Gb. And messages with ~4Kb. Ext4 ? Thanks in advance Zinato Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ Lis

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:44:56AM -0800, Andrew Morgan wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Julien Vehent wrote: > > > On 12/16/2010 01:04 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote: > >> You appear to be logged in as a cyrus admin user. In that case, the > >> NAMESPACEs listed above are correct. "Other Users" are in the

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Julien Vehent
On 12/16/2010 01:54 PM, Dan White wrote: > See RFC 2342 for the specification on what the NAMESPACE response means. > > In this case, it appears you created a mailbox named 'shared.testshared', > which falls under the shared name space in Cyrus, and in which case the > 'shared.' part of the mailbox

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Julien Vehent
On 12/16/2010 01:34 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 13:23 -0500, Julien Vehent wrote: >> On 12/16/2010 01:04 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote: >>> You appear to be logged in as a cyrus admin user. In that case, the >>> NAMESPACEs listed above are correct. "Other Users" are in the "use

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Dan White
On 16/12/10 13:23 -0500, Julien Vehent wrote: >On 12/16/2010 01:04 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote: >> You appear to be logged in as a cyrus admin user. In that case, the >> NAMESPACEs listed above are correct. "Other Users" are in the "user." >> hierarchy, and "Shared Folders" are at the root level, in Cy

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Andrew Morgan
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Julien Vehent wrote: > On 12/16/2010 01:04 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote: >> You appear to be logged in as a cyrus admin user. In that case, the >> NAMESPACEs listed above are correct. "Other Users" are in the "user." >> hierarchy, and "Shared Folders" are at the root level, in Cyru

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 13:23 -0500, Julien Vehent wrote: > On 12/16/2010 01:04 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote: > > You appear to be logged in as a cyrus admin user. In that case, the > > NAMESPACEs listed above are correct. "Other Users" are in the "user." > > hierarchy, and "Shared Folders" are at the roo

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Julien Vehent
On 12/16/2010 01:04 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote: > You appear to be logged in as a cyrus admin user. In that case, the > NAMESPACEs listed above are correct. "Other Users" are in the "user." > hierarchy, and "Shared Folders" are at the root level, in Cyrus' > internal namespace. > I'm logged in with m

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Andrew Morgan
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Julien Vehent wrote: > On 12/14/2010 02:18 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 14:14 -0500, Julien Vehent wrote: >>> Hi list, >>> I was experimenting with shared mailboxes today. That's something new >>> I've never used before. >>> I wrote a wiki page of my

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Julien Vehent
Reading this old post from the mailing list: http://www.mail-archive.com/info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu/msg02406.html It seems that userprefix and sharedprefix are only taken into account when altnamespace: yes. Correct ? Then, how can I obtain the same behavior with altnamespace: no ? Than

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Julien Vehent
On 12/16/2010 11:25 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > Are you restarting the Cyrus service between changes to the > configuration [imapd.conf] file? Are you sure you are editing the > correct imapd.conf file? > Yes and yes. Once again, when I change altnamespace to yes in that imapd.conf file,

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 11:02 -0500, Julien Vehent wrote: > On 12/16/2010 10:48 AM, Simon Matter wrote: > >> On 12/16/2010 10:01 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > >>> Don't know, I see - > >>> 23 NAMESPACE > >>> * NAMESPACE (("" ".")) (("Other Users." ".")) (("Shared Folders." ".")) > >>> 123 OK Comp

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Julien Vehent
On 12/16/2010 10:48 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 12/16/2010 10:01 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >>> Don't know, I see - >>> >>> 123 NAMESPACE >>> * NAMESPACE (("" ".")) (("Other Users." ".")) (("Shared Folders." ".")) >>> 123 OK Completed >>> >>> Have you specified a "sharedprefix:" in imapd.con

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Simon Matter
> On 12/16/2010 10:01 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> Don't know, I see - >> >> 123 NAMESPACE >> * NAMESPACE (("" ".")) (("Other Users." ".")) (("Shared Folders." ".")) >> 123 OK Completed >> >> Have you specified a "sharedprefix:" in imapd.conf? Your second value >> "users." looks odd as well

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Julien Vehent
On 12/16/2010 10:01 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > Don't know, I see - > > 123 NAMESPACE > * NAMESPACE (("" ".")) (("Other Users." ".")) (("Shared Folders." ".")) > 123 OK Completed > > Have you specified a "sharedprefix:" in imapd.conf? Your second value > "users." looks odd as well [have you

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Joseph Brennan
Julien Vehent wrote: > --- > . namespace > * NAMESPACE (("INBOX." ".")) (("user." ".")) (("" ".")) > --- > > Question is: shouldn't the 3rd argument be of the type "shared." ? > (Like in example 5.4 of the RFC [1]). There can be a null namespace. We use it for one's own mailboxes.-- b name

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:48 -0500, Julien Vehent wrote: > On 12/16/2010 09:32 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:24 -0500, Julien Vehent wrote: > >> I have a problem with the shared mailbox and roundcube webmail. > >> While Thunderbird can access the shared mailbox just fin

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Julien Vehent
On 12/16/2010 09:32 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:24 -0500, Julien Vehent wrote: >> On 12/14/2010 02:18 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >>> On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 14:14 -0500, Julien Vehent wrote: Hi list, I was experimenting with shared mailboxes today. That's s

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:24 -0500, Julien Vehent wrote: > On 12/14/2010 02:18 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 14:14 -0500, Julien Vehent wrote: > >> Hi list, > >> I was experimenting with shared mailboxes today. That's something new > >> I've never used before. > >> I wrote

Re: Shared mailboxes doc

2010-12-16 Thread Julien Vehent
On 12/14/2010 02:18 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 14:14 -0500, Julien Vehent wrote: >> Hi list, >> I was experimenting with shared mailboxes today. That's something new >> I've never used before. >> I wrote a wiki page of my setup on debian squeeze (still on cyrus 2.2) >> a